6533b835fe1ef96bd129eb15
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Robust model calibration using determinist and stochastic performance metrics
Emmanuel FoltetePaul LepineMarie-océane ParentScott Cogansubject
Mathematical optimizationTurbine bladeComputer scienceDecision theorymedia_common.quotation_subjectRobust solutionModel calibrationFidelityInfo-gap approach02 engineering and technology01 natural scienceslaw.invention010104 statistics & probabilitylawRobustness (computer science)0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering0101 mathematicsmedia_commonModel selectionPerformance metricUncertaintyExperimental dataAmbiguity[PHYS.MECA]Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]020201 artificial intelligence & image processingPerformance metricdescription
International audience; The aeronautics industry has benefited from the use of numerical models to supplement or replace the costly design-build-test paradigm. These models are often calibrated using experimental data to obtain optimal fidelity-to-data but compensating effects between calibration parameters can complicate the model selection process due to the non-uniqueness of the solution. One way to reduce this ambiguity is to include a robustness requirement to the selection criteria. In this study, the info-gap decision theory is used to represent the lack of knowledge resulting from compensating effects and a robustness analysis is performed to investigate the impact of uncertainty on both deterministic and stochastic fidelity metrics. The proposed methodology is illustrated on an academic example representing the dynamic response of a composite turbine blade.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-01-25 |