6533b835fe1ef96bd129f78d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Zakres kognicji sądu w postępowaniu o wydanie wyroku łącznego. Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 25.02.2020r., IV KK 78/19
subject
prawomocnośćcumulative pena/tycriminal proceedingskara łącznafina/ and binding nature of the judgmentproceedings on issuing a cumulative judgmentwyrok łącznycumulative judgmentpostępowanie karnepostępowanie w przedmiocie wydania wyroku łącznegodescription
The commentary discusses the scope of the court's jurisdiction in the proceedings to issue a cumulative judgment. The author agrees with the Supreme Court's view that, in its cumulative judgment, a court should neither assess whether individual penalties imposed under separate judgments are correct, nor should it analyse the extent of culpability and the social harm caused by the acts. This is because the court's rulings on those matters, which are contained in the individual convicting judgments, are fina/ and binding. In the proceedings on issuing a cumulative judgment, the court only rules on what the cumulative pena/ty, which will ultimately be enforced, will be, white considering the instructions stipulated in Article 85a of the Pena/ Code, as we/I other directives on the extent of the sentence and any other special instructions
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 | Przegląd Sądowy |