6533b835fe1ef96bd12a017d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Quo vadis SANEPID? A cross-country analysis of public health reforms in 10 post-Soviet states
Claudia B. MaierJose M. Martin-morenosubject
medicine.medical_specialtyEconomic growthAzerbaijanRepublic of BelarusHealth PromotionPublic administrationGeorgia (Republic)medicineHumansPost-Soviet statesKyrgyzstanHealth policybusiness.industryHealth PolicyPublic healthInternational healthUzbekistanGrey literatureArmeniaMoldovaKazakhstanSiberiaHealth promotionHealth Care ReformPreventive MedicineIntersectoral CollaborationUkrainebusinessPublic Health AdministrationStrengths and weaknessesdescription
Abstract Background The public health systems of the post-Soviet states have evolved from the san-epid system, which dominated public health practice throughout the former Soviet Union. Since independence, reforms have taken different directions. This article provides a cross-country comparison of public health reform processes and contents in 10 post-Soviet states. Methods The study is descriptive and comparative, based on a literature review of the major health databases, the Health Systems in Transition (HiT) volumes and grey literature. Search terms included terms on public health, the san-epid services and organizational reforms in one or several post-Soviet states. Results Public health reforms have varied greatly: some countries have preserved the san-epid structure, some have built structures in addition to the san-epid system, and others have set up a new public health infrastructure. Traditional “functions” of the former san-epid system, such as vaccination, are still more advanced, while health promotion and intersectoral collaboration are less developed. Conclusion Critical self-evaluation, implementation of performance measurement and rigorous external research will prove essential in identifying strengths and weaknesses of past reforms and learning for the future.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010-04-13 | Health Policy |