6533b836fe1ef96bd12a0b1b

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Deontology of Compound Actions

Janusz Czelakowski

subject

Relation (database)LogicComputer sciencePermission050905 science studies0603 philosophy ethics and religionAtomic actionHistory and Philosophy of ScienceCompound actionCanonical modelFinitaryFrameGödel's completeness theoremObligationAxiomSequential action05 social sciences06 humanities and the artsFocus (linguistics)AlgebraProhibitionObligation060302 philosophy0509 other social sciencesComputational linguisticsModel

description

This paper, being a companion to the book [2] elaborates the deontology of sequential and compound actions based on relational models and formal constructs borrowed from formal linguistics. The semantic constructions presented in this paper emulate to some extent the content of  [3] but are more involved. Although the present work should be regarded as a sequel of [3] it is self-contained and may be read independently. The issue of permission and obligation of actions is presented in the form of a logical system . This system is semantically defined by providing its intended models in which the role of actions of various types (atomic, sequential and compound ones) is accentuated. Since the consequence relation is not finitary, other semantically defined variants of are defined. The focus is on the finitary system in which only finite compound actions are admissible. An adequate axiom system for it is defined. The strong completeness theorem is the central result. The role of the canonical model in the proof of the completeness theorem is emphasized.

10.1007/s11225-018-9834-4https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11225-018-9834-4