6533b836fe1ef96bd12a175a
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Glorifying Elohim with Dispositive and Probative Facts for Subsequent Motions:Nosce Te Ipsum (A Logic and Mathematics’ Approach)
Dallas Bellsubject
BR ChristianityBJ EthicsB Philosophy (General)P Philology. LinguisticsQA01 Combinatoricsdescription
Pythagoras made the imperative “Man know thyself; then thou shalt know the Universe and God.” One of the Egyptian Luxor Temple proverbs is "Man, know thyself, and you are going to know the gods” and another is "The body is the house of God.” In some ways all classical literature addresses this question. Shakespeare’s asked the famous question, “To be, or not to be, that is the question,” which can be said, “To (X) be (Ǝ), or (V) not (¬) to (X) be (Ǝ), that is (=) the question (a known unknown, ?),” or ((X) Ǝ) V (¬ (X) Ǝ) = ?. Dispositive and probative facts for subsequent motions can be shown as proof of knowing God, which can be simply stated with logic and mathematics: know (cog) God (I) therefore, ∴, know (cog) thyself (X), or cog (I) ∴ cog (X), reducible to I ∴ X. Then, know self because, ∵, know God, or cog (X) ∵ cog (I), reducible to X ∵ I. Human potential to know themselves can then represented as the set {cog (I) + cog (X) + glor (I)} ⊂ {δt + δs}.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-01 |