6533b837fe1ef96bd12a1f8b

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries

Andreas HeinzPhilipp E. SischkaCarolina CatundaAlina CosmaIrene García-moyaNelli LyyraAnne KamanUlrike Ravens-siebererWilliam Pickett

subject

HBSC symptom checklistHealth behaviour in school‑aged childrenAdolescentPsychometrics: Public health health care sciences & services [D22] [Human health sciences]EpidemiologyEmotionskyselytutkimuslapset (ikäryhmät): Santé publique services médicaux & soins de santé [D22] [Sciences de la santé humaine]Health InformaticsAdolescentsnuoretmielenterveysSurveys and QuestionnairesHumansChildreliabiliteettiMeasurement invarianceSchoolsCross-nationalSubjective health complaintsReproducibility of ResultsPsychosomatic health complaintsChecklistpsykometriikkaSelf‑reported health complaintsvaliditeettimittarit (mittaus)psykosomatiikkaDifferential item functioning

description

Abstract Background The Symptom Checklist (SCL) developed by the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study is a non-clinical measure of psychosomatic complaints (e.g., headache and feeling low) that has been used in numerous studies. Several studies have investigated the psychometric characteristics of this scale; however, some psychometric properties remain unclear, among them especially a) dimensionality, b) adequacy of the Graded Response Model (GRM), and c) measurement invariance across countries. Methods Data from 229,906 adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 from 46 countries that participated in the 2018 HBSC survey were analyzed. Adolescents were selected using representative sampling and surveyed by questionnaire in the classroom. Dimensionality was investigated using exploratory graph analysis. In addition, we investigated whether the GRM provided an adequate description of the data. Reliability over the latent variable continuum and differential test functioning across countries were also examined. Results Exploratory graph analyses showed that SCL can be considered as one-dimensional in 16 countries. However, a comparison of the unidimensional with a post-hoc bifactor GRM showed that deviation from a hypothesized one-dimensional structure was negligible in most countries. Multigroup invariance analyses supported configural and metric invariance, but not scalar invariance across 32 countries. Alignment analysis showed non-invariance especially for the items irritability, feeling nervous/bad temper and feeling low. Conclusion HBSC-SCL appears to represent a consistent and reliable unidimensional instrument across most countries. This bodes well for population health analyses that rely on this scale as an early indicator of mental health status.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01698-3