6533b838fe1ef96bd12a3bb9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A survey on handling computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems using surrogates: non-nature inspired methods

Jussi HakanenMohammad TabatabaeiKarthik SindhyaKaisa MiettinenMarkus Hartikainen

subject

Mathematical optimizationEngineeringControl and Optimizationbusiness.industryPareto principlePareto frontierDecision makerSampling techniqueComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided DesignMulti-objective optimizationComputer Science ApplicationsMultiobjective optimization problemPareto optimalConflicting objectivesBlack-box functionControl and Systems EngineeringMulticriteria Decision Making (MCDM)Computational costNature inspiredMetamodeling techniquebusinessEngineering design processSoftware

description

Computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems arise, e.g. in many engineering applications, where several conflicting objectives are to be optimized simultaneously while satisfying constraints. In many cases, the lack of explicit mathematical formulas of the objectives and constraints may necessitate conducting computationally expensive and time-consuming experiments and/or simulations. As another challenge, these problems may have either convex or nonconvex or even disconnected Pareto frontier consisting of Pareto optimal solutions. Because of the existence of many such solutions, typically, a decision maker is required to select the most preferred one. In order to deal with the high computational cost, surrogate-based methods are commonly used in the literature. This paper surveys surrogate-based methods proposed in the literature, where the methods are independent of the underlying optimization algorithm and mitigate the computational burden to capture different types of Pareto frontiers. The methods considered are classified, discussed and then compared. These methods are divided into two frameworks: the sequential and the adaptive frameworks. Based on the comparison, we recommend the adaptive framework to tackle the aforementioned challenges. peerReviewed

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1226-z