6533b83afe1ef96bd12a7a4b

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: Combining smartphone logging with experience sampling

Saara EhlertDinda Nuranissa SetiawanNicole WalasekTobias DienlinNiklas JohannesMoniek BuijzenLeonard ReineckeHarm VelingAdrian Meier

subject

Experience sampling methodBehaviour Change and Well-beingSocial PsychologySocial connectednessCommunicationmedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesLoggingApplied psychology050801 communication & media studies050109 social psychologySocial DevelopmentCommunication and Media0508 media and communicationsInformation and Communications TechnologyWell-beingLife Science0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesInformationSystems_MISCELLANEOUSPsychologyEveryday lifeApplied PsychologyVigilance (psychology)media_common

description

Contains fulltext : 220301.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Through communication technology, users find themselves constantly connected to others to such an extent that they routinely develop a mindset of connectedness. This mindset has been defined as online vigilance. Although there is a large body of research on media use and well-being, the question of how online vigilance impacts well-being remains unanswered. In this preregistered study, we combine experience sampling and smartphone logging to address the relation of online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life. Seventy-five Android users answered eight daily surveys over five days (N = 1615) whilst having their smartphone use logged. Thinking about smartphone-mediated social interactions (i.e., the salience dimension of online vigilance) was negatively related to affective well-being. However, it was far more important whether those thoughts were positive or negative. No other dimension of online vigilance was robustly related to affective well-being. Taken together, our results suggest that online vigilance does not pose a serious threat to affective well-being in everyday life. 25 p.

10.1080/15213269.2020.1768122http://hdl.handle.net/2066/220301