6533b850fe1ef96bd12a820f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Beyond psychology: prevalence of p value and confidence interval misinterpretation across different fields

Yuepei XuChuan-peng HuXiao-fan ZhaoXi-nian ZuoXiao-kang Lyu

subject

Open scienceSocial PsychologyStatistical index05 social sciencesScientific literature050105 experimental psychologyConfidence interval03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineMeta researchStatistics0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesp-valuePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

P values and confidence intervals (CIs) are the most widely used statistical indices in scientific literature. Several surveys have revealed that these two indices are generally misunderstood. However, existing surveys on this subject fall under psychology and biomedical research, and data from other disciplines are rare. Moreover, the confidence of researchers when constructing judgments remains unclear. To fill this research gap, we surveyed 1,479 researchers and students from different fields in China. Results reveal that for significant (i.e., p < .05, CI does not include zero) and non-significant (i.e., p > .05, CI includes zero) conditions, most respondents, regardless of academic degrees, research fields and stages of career, could not interpret p values and CIs accurately. Moreover, the majority were confident about their (inaccurate) judgements (see osf.io/mcu9q/ for raw data, materials, and supplementary analyses). Therefore, as misinterpretations of p values and CIs prevail in the whole scientific community, there is a need for better statistical training in science.

https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.28