6533b850fe1ef96bd12a83f7

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Are locally finite MV-algebras a variety?

Marco AbbadiniLuca Spada

subject

Class (set theory)Pure mathematicsAlgebra and Number Theory06D35 (Primary) 18C05 (Secondary)Duality (mathematics)Mathematics - Category TheoryMathematics - LogicArityMathematical proofComputer Science::Logic in Computer ScienceMathematics::Category TheoryFOS: MathematicsCountable setFinitaryCategory Theory (math.CT)Variety (universal algebra)Logic (math.LO)Categorical variableMathematics

description

We answer Mundici's problem number 3 (D. Mundici. Advanced {\L}ukasiewicz calculus. Trends in Logic Vol. 35. Springer 2011, p. 235): Is the category of locally finite MV-algebras equivalent to an equational class? We prove: (i) The category of locally finite MV-algebras is not equivalent to any finitary variety. (ii) More is true: the category of locally finite MV-algebras is not equivalent to any finitely-sorted finitary quasi-variety. (iii) The category of locally finite MV-algebras is equivalent to an infinitary variety; with operations of at most countable arity. (iv) The category of locally finite MV-algebras is equivalent to a countably-sorted finitary variety. Our proofs rest upon the duality between locally finite MV-algebras and the category of multisets by R. Cignoli, E. J. Dubuc and D. Mundici, and categorical characterisations of varieties and quasi-varieties proved by J. Duskin, J. R. Isbell, F. W. Lawvere and others. In fact no knowledge on MV-algebras is needed, apart from the aforementioned duality.

https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2102.11913