6533b853fe1ef96bd12ad4c3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Improving marine protected area governance through collaboration and co-production.

Katie E. HoggAntonio Di FrancoDrosos KoutsoubasNathan J. BennettLuca SantarossaOscar Esparza AlaminosPaolo GuidettiMarco MilazzoMarianne LangAntonio CalòFederico NiccoliniMarie-aude Sévin-allouetMosor Prvan

subject

Good governanceConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental Engineering0208 environmental biotechnologyPsychological interventionFisheriesStakeholder engagementContext (language use)Marine BiologyAction researchCo-production Collaboration Good governance Marine protected areas Perceived socio-ecological benefits Animals Biodiversity Fishes Humans Marine Biology Mediterranean Sea Conservation of Natural Resources Fisheries02 engineering and technology010501 environmental sciencesManagement Monitoring Policy and Law01 natural sciencesGood governanceLeverage (negotiation)Marine protected areasMediterranean SeaAnimalsHumans14. Life underwaterAction researchWaste Management and DisposalEnvironmental planning0105 earth and related environmental sciencesCorporate governanceFishesGeneral MedicineBiodiversityAction research; Co-production; Collaboration; Good governance; Marine protected areas; Perceived socio-ecological benefits; Animals; Biodiversity; Fishes; Humans; Marine Biology; Mediterranean Sea; Conservation of Natural Resources; FisheriesCollaboration020801 environmental engineeringCo-production13. Climate action[SDE]Environmental SciencesPerceived socio-ecological benefitsMarine protected areaBusinessAction research

description

Marine protected areas (MPAs) socio-ecological effectiveness depends on a number of management and governance elements, among which stakeholder engagement and community support play key roles. Collaborative conservation initiatives that engage stakeholders in action research and knowledge co-production processes can enhance management and governance of MPAs. To design effective strategies aimed at reconciling biodiversity conservation and management of sustainable human uses, it is key to assess how local communities respond to such initiatives and identify the set of contextual factors, institutional, local and individual, potentially affecting these responses. This paper presents the approach and results of one such initiative, spanning 6 EU countries and 11 MPAs in the Mediterranean Sea, focusing on small-scale fishers as key MPA users. Through a collaborative project, managers and fishers agreed upon specific governance interventions (e.g. increasing stakeholder engagement, engaging fishers in monitoring activities, reducing fishing efforts) to be implemented in each MPA for one year. Structured surveys queried: MPA managers on the MPA context, governance structure, feasibility and effectiveness of the tested interventions; and small-scale fishers on their perceptions of the impact of the tested interventions on a set of 9 socio-ecological variables (e.g. amount of fish caught, level of participation in decision-making, support for the MPA). Results revealed that the interventions tested were relatively feasible, effective and cost-effective. Fishers reported positive perceptions of the interventions for the 9 variables considered, especially for level of support for the MPA and for those associated with aspects of governance. Proportional odds models highlighted perceived effects are maximized under certain institutional, local and individual circumstances (e.g. old MPAs, small fisher communities, and fishers with a high proportion of income from fisheries). Findings highlight that employing good governance processes involving stakeholders may rapidly generate improved local support for conservation and provide insights for potential leverage points upon which to act to maximize perceived effectiveness and enhance support toward MPAs.

10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110757https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32560987