6533b854fe1ef96bd12ae0b4
RESEARCH PRODUCT
The Bua Group noun class system: Looking for a historical interpretation
Pascal BoyeldieuRaimund KastenholzFlorian LionnetUlrich Kleinewillinghöfersubject
HistoryAdamawa languagesmedia_common.quotation_subjectsuffi xdeterminer050105 experimental psychologyNoun classNounmorphologyDeterminerHistorical linguistics0501 psychology and cognitive sciences[SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/LinguisticsAssociation (psychology)media_common060201 languages & linguisticsInterpretation (logic)05 social sciences06 humanities and the artsBua languages[SHS.LANGUE] Humanities and Social Sciences/LinguisticsLinguisticsAgreementhistorical linguisticsstacking0602 languages and literatureIndependence (mathematical logic)noun classesagreementdescription
International audience; The way Bua languages express number on nouns mostly consists ofalternating suffi xes that bear witness of a former classifi cation system. However,Kulaal is the only present-day language where these markers are not frozen butactually trigger agreement with free, optional determiners that follow the noun andmay show some formal affi nity with its suffi x. For several reasons, previous attemptsat reconstructing a historical noun morphology common to all Bua languagesconsidered the sole suffi xes and neglected the determiners present in Kulaal. But,as is argued in the present paper, more recent data show that, in some cases, presentdaysuffi xes may result from the association of a former suffi x with an elementsimilar to one of the Kulaal determiners. In such cases the former determiner hassimply lost its independence and been historically stacked onto the noun form.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-25 |