6533b854fe1ef96bd12ae22d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Compounds, phrases and clitics in connected speech
Hilary S.z. WynneAditi LahiriLinda Wheeldonsubject
Linguistics and LanguageExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyVerbPhonological wordcomputer.software_genre050105 experimental psychologyLanguage and LinguisticsArtificial Intelligence0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesConnected speech060201 languages & linguisticsLanguage productionbusiness.industry05 social sciences06 humanities and the artsLinguisticsNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyCompound0602 languages and literatureProduction (computer science)Artificial intelligenceProsodic unitPsychologybusinesscomputerNatural language processingSentencedescription
Abstract Four language production experiments examine how English speakers plan compound words during phonological encoding. The experiments tested production latencies in both delayed and online tasks for English noun-noun compounds (e.g., daytime), adjective-noun phrases (e.g., dark time), and monomorphemic words (e.g., denim). In delayed production, speech onset latencies reflect the total number of prosodic units in the target sentence. In online production, speech latencies reflect the size of the first prosodic unit. Compounds are metrically similar to adjective-noun phrases as they contain two lexical and two prosodic words. However, in Experiments 1 and 2, native English speakers treated the compounds as single prosodic units, indistinguishable from simple words, with RT data statistically different than that of the adjective-noun phrases. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate that compounds are also treated as single prosodic units in utterances containing clitics (e.g., dishcloths are clean) as they incorporate the verb into a single phonological word (i.e. dishcloths-are). Taken together, these results suggest that English compounds are planned as single recursive prosodic units. Our data require an adaptation of the classic model of phonological encoding to incorporate a distinction between lexical and postlexical prosodic processes, such that lexical boundaries have consequences for post-lexical phonological encoding.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-10-02 | Journal of Memory and Language |