6533b854fe1ef96bd12afc3f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Do fee-shifting rules affect plaintiffs’ win rates? A theoretical and empirical analysis
Marta Martínez-matuteJuan S. Mora-sanguinettiGabriel Domenech-pascualsubject
040101 forestryEconomics and EconometricsPlaintiffJurisdiction05 social sciencesDeferenceLegislation04 agricultural and veterinary sciencesAffect (psychology)0502 economics and businessEconomicsSelection (linguistics)0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries050207 economicsEmpirical evidenceLawFinanceLaw and economicsdescription
Abstract This article studies whether fee-shifting rules can affect plaintiffs’ win rates. Beyond theoretical modeling, this study goes a step further and provides empirical evidence on this issue, thanks to the study of a real change in Spanish legislation. Spain applied the so-called English rule in 2011 in the administrative jurisdiction. This study explores whether plaintiffs were more or less successful when litigating against public administrations since then. After controlling for several other factors, it is shown that the new rule considerably increased plaintiffs’ win rate (while also reducing litigation). The paper also presents a theoretical model explaining that the English rule can increase the prevalence of judgments in favor of plaintiffs through two channels: the selection of cases brought before the courts by interested parties and the level of deference paid by courts to the decisions under review.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-01 | International Review of Law and Economics |