6533b855fe1ef96bd12b1503
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A Brief Measure for the Assessment of Competence in Coping With Death: The Coping With Death Scale Short Version.
Noemí SansóGustavo De SimoneAmparo OliverLaura GalianaEnric BenitoJuan P. Linzittosubject
AdultMaleCoping (psychology)Palliative careAttitude to DeathPsychometricsHealth PersonnelArgentinaBurnoutQuality of life scaleValidity03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineCoping with deathSurveys and QuestionnairesAdaptation PsychologicalMedicineHumansMeasurement invariance030212 general & internal medicineDaily exposureCompetence (human resources)General NursingAgedbusiness.industryPalliative care professionalsPalliative CareReproducibility of ResultsMiddle AgedReliabilityAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineCross-Sectional StudiesCompassion fatigueSpain030220 oncology & carcinogenesisQuality of LifeFemaleNeurology (clinical)Compassion FatiguebusinessFactor Analysis StatisticalInvariance measurementClinical psychologydescription
Context. The coping with death competence is of great importance for palliative care professionals, who face daily exposure to death. It can keep them from suffering compassion fatigue and burnout, thus enhancing the quality of the care provided. Despite its relevance, there are only two measures of professionals’ ability to cope with death. Specifically, the Coping with Death Scale (CDS) has repeatedly shown psychometric problems with some of its items. Objective. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short version of the CDS. Methods. Nine items from the original CDS were chosen for the short version. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Spanish (N ¼ 385) and Argentinian (N ¼ 273) palliative care professionals. The CDS and the Professional Quality of Life Scale were used in this study. Statistical analyses included two confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), followed by a standard measurement invariance routine. Reliability estimates and evidence of validity based on relations with other measures were also gathered. Results. CFA models had excellent fit in both the Spanish (c2(27) ¼ 107.043, P < 0.001; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] ¼ 0.978; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] ¼ 0.970; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] ¼ 0.093 [0.075, 0.112]; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual ¼ 0.030) and Argentinian (c2(27) ¼ 102.982, P < 0.001; CFI ¼ 0.963; TLI ¼ 0.950; RMSEA ¼ 0.106 [0.085, 0.128]) samples. A standard measurement invariance routine was carried out. The most parsimonious model (c2(117) ¼ 191.738, P < 0.001; CFI ¼ 0.987; TLI ¼ 0.992; RMSEA ¼ 0.046 [0.034, 0.058]; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual ¼ 0.043) offered evidence of invariance across countries, with no latent mean differences. Evidence of reliability and evidence of validity based on relations with other measures were also appropriate. Conclusion. Results indicated the psychometric boundaries of the short version of the CDS. post-print 172 KB
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-01-01 | Journal of pain and symptom management |