6533b856fe1ef96bd12b2566
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Negotiations with a risk assessment tool: Standardized decision-making in the United States and the deprofessionalization thesis
Pascal Bastiansubject
Evidence-based practiceSocial workmedia_common.quotation_subject05 social sciencesPerspective (graphical)Risk management toolsDiscretion050906 social workNegotiationChild protectionLaw0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesEngineering ethicsSociology0509 other social sciencesRisk assessment050104 developmental & child psychologymedia_commondescription
AbstractThis article focuses on the challenges of decision-making in child protection. Comparative studies show that standardized risk assessment tools predict future maltreatment more accurately than interpretative assessment. Despite a long tradition of research on statistical decision-making, few studies deal with how such instruments are used and integrated into professional decision-making practice, and – from a transnational perspective – how specific national regulations influence such instruments and decision-making at street level. The article discusses concerns about the fact that such classification systems might have a negative impact on professional discretion. Based on a materialist approach, it highlights the actual practice of professional decision-making under the conditions of the application of actuarial tools. Using data from an ethnographical study, a practice of negotiation can be shown between the social workers and the assessment tools. The idea is discussed that this negotiation p...
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-04 | Transnational Social Review |