6533b856fe1ef96bd12b277e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Contrasting coping styles meet the wall: A dopamine driven dichotomy in behavior and cognition
Erik HöglundErik HöglundPatricia I. M. SilvaPatricia I. M. SilvaMarco A. VindasMarco A. VindasØYvind ØVerlisubject
0301 basic medicineSTRESSNEUROSCIENCESTELEOST FISHESFLEXIBILITYRAINBOW-TROUTINDIVIDUAL VARIATIONteleostsAmygdalacognitive flexibilitylcsh:RC321-571Developmental psychology03 medical and health sciencesBehavioral syndrome0302 clinical medicineLimbic systemmonoamineslimbic systembiology.animalNeuroplasticitymedicine14. Life underwaterlcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryOriginal ResearchbiologyDANIO-RERIOGeneral NeuroscienceCognitive flexibilityVertebrateNEURAL PLASTICITYbiology.organism_classificationRECEPTORSAMYGDALATrout030104 developmental biologymedicine.anatomical_structurepersonalityANIMAL PERSONALITIESRainbow troutNeuroscience030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNeurosciencedescription
Individual variation in the ability to modify previously learned behaviour is an important dimension of trait correlations referred to as coping styles, behavioral syndromes or personality. These trait clusters have been shaped by natural selection, and underlying control mechanisms are often conserved throughout vertebrate evolution. In teleost fishes, behavioral flexibility and coping style have been studied in the high (HR) and low-responsive (LR) rainbow trout lines. Generally, proactive LR trout show a behaviour guided by previously learned routines, while HR trout show a more flexible behaviour relying on environmental cues. In mammals, routine dependent vs flexible behavior has been connected to variation in limbic dopamine (DA) signalling. Here we studied the link between limbic DA signalling and individual variation in flexibility in teleost fishes by a reversal learning approach. HR/LR trout were challenged by blocking a learned escape route, previously available during interaction with a large and aggressive conspecific. LR trout performed a higher number of failed escape attempts against the transparent blockage, while HR trout were more able to inhibit the now futile escape impulse. Regionally discrete changes in DA neurochemistry were observed in micro dissected limbic areas of the telencephalon. Most notably, DA utilisation in the dorsomedial telencephalon (DM, a suggested amygdala equivalent) remained stable in HR trout in response to reversal learning under acute stress, while increasing from an initially lower level in LR trout. In summary, these results support the view that limbic homologues control individual differences in behavioural flexibility even in non-mammalian vertebrates.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-07-24 |