6533b859fe1ef96bd12b7950

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy : a systematic review

Alba Sánchez-torresCosme Gay-escodaMaría ÁNgeles Sánchez-garcésJorge Toledano-serrabona

subject

medicine.medical_treatmentAlveolar Bone LossOsteogenesis DistractionDentistryReviewMandibleCochrane LibraryBone resorptionlaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawPathologyMedicineHumansDental implantBone regenerationGeneral DentistryRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDental ImplantsCirurgiaImplants dentalsbusiness.industryDental implants030206 dentistryAlveolar Ridge AugmentationAlveolar Ridge Augmentation:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]PatologiaOtorhinolaryngology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASDistraction osteogenesisSurgeryImplantOral SurgeryAtrophybusiness

description

Background To determine if alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis obtains better results compared to other bone regeneration treatments (guided bone regeneration with membranes and / or filling material, or autogenous bone graft) in terms of bone gain, complications, and implant survival and success rates. Material and Methods An electronic search was performed in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library and Scopus databases in March 2017. Besides, a manual search was carried out. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials published within the last 10 years with at least 1 year of follow-up after implant placement. No language restriction was applied. Exclusion criteria were studies in patients with bone defects produced by trauma, congenital malformation or oncologic surgical treatment. The methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated by means of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for assessing risk of bias. The reports were classified into different levels of recommendation according to the “Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy “. Results Out of 221 articles, two randomized controlled trials were finally selected for the inclusion in the systematic review. Bone gain and complications were higher with the alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis compared to the autologous bone graft. There was higher bone resorption with the autologous bone graft. Implant survival and success rates were similar between studies, despite of the used technique. Conclusions Both alveolar distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone graft are effective bone regeneration techniques for the treatment of mandibular vertical bone atrophy. A level B recommendation can be established for the use of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of the mandibular vertical bone atrophy. Key words:Distraction osteogenesis, alveolar ridge augmentation, alveolar bone loss.

http://hdl.handle.net/10550/69459