6533b85bfe1ef96bd12bad4e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants: a prospective, randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study.

Hennig SchliephakeFrank SchwarzMarcus O. KleinBilal Al-nawasJürgen C. BeckerHendrik Terheyden

subject

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyBone RegenerationDouble blindedUrologyAlveolar Bone Losschemistry.chemical_elementBone MatrixBiocompatible MaterialsDehiscencePostoperative ComplicationsDouble-Blind MethodOsseointegrationOsteogenesisSurgical Wound DehiscencemedicineHumansProspective StudiesBone regenerationDental ImplantsTitaniumMineralsWound Healingbusiness.industryCollagen membraneSoft tissueMembranes ArtificialSurgerychemistryMulticenter studyBone SubstitutesFemaleImplantCollagenOral SurgerybusinessTitaniumDental AlloysFollow-Up Studies

description

OBJECTIVES The aim of the present randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study was to assess the use of either a new cross-linked (VN) or a native collagen membrane (BG) for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of n=54 patients were recruited in four German university clinics. According to a parallel-groups design, dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants were filled with a natural bone mineral and randomly assigned to either VN or BG. Submerged sites were allowed to heal for 4 months. Primary (e.g., changes in defect length - DeltaDL, quality of newly formed tissue [0-4] - TQ) and secondary parameters (e.g., membrane exposure, tissue conditions at dehisced sites) were consecutively recorded. RESULTS Four patients were excluded due to an early wound infection (VN:3; BG:1), and one patient was lost during follow-up (VN). The mean DeltaDL was 3.0 +/- 2.5 mm in the VN, and 1.94 +/- 2.13 mm in the BG group. The assessment of TQ revealed comparable mean values in both groups (VN: 3.05 +/- 1.66, BG: 3.46 +/- 1.48). A significant correlation between membrane exposure and inflammation of the adjacent soft tissue was observed in the VN group. In both groups, the mean DL and TQ values were not significantly different at either non-exposed or exposed implant sites. CONCLUSION The results of the present study have indicated that VN supported bone regeneration on a level non-inferior to BG. However, in case of a premature membrane exposure, cross-linking might impair soft-tissue healing or may even cause wound infections.

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01689.xhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19302393