6533b85bfe1ef96bd12bb6b4
RESEARCH PRODUCT
How physical parameterizations can modulate internal variability in a regional climate model
Benjamin PohlJulien Crétatsubject
ConvectionRainfallAtmospheric Science010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences0207 environmental engineeringRegional modelsTropics[ SDU.STU.ME ] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Meteorology02 engineering and technologyForcing (mathematics)[SDU.STU.ME]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/MeteorologyIntraseasonal variability01 natural sciencesConvective rainfall13. Climate actionInternal variabilityClimatologyAfricaEnvironmental scienceClimate model020701 environmental engineeringClimate variability0105 earth and related environmental sciencesdescription
Abstract The authors analyze to what extent the internal variability simulated by a regional climate model is sensitive to its physical parameterizations. The influence of two convection schemes is quantified over southern Africa, where convective rainfall predominates. Internal variability is much larger with the Kain–Fritsch scheme than for the Grell–Dévényi scheme at the seasonal, intraseasonal, and daily time scales, and from the regional to the local (grid point) spatial scales. Phenomenological analyses reveal that the core (periphery) of the rain-bearing systems tends to be highly (weakly) reproducible, showing that it is their morphological features that induce the largest internal variability in the model. In addition to the domain settings and the lateral forcing conditions extensively analyzed in the literature, the physical package appears thus as a key factor that modulates the reproducible and irreproducible components of regional climate variability.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2012-02-01 |