6533b85dfe1ef96bd12bdd04
RESEARCH PRODUCT
A comparison of the efficacy of commercial and experimental vaccines for contagious agalactia in sheep
Roberto PuleioMarco Pio La MannaGuido Ruggero LoriaAntonella UsticanoValeria ChiaracaneGuido SireciUmit OzdemirVincenzo Di MarcoFrancesco DieliAnnalisa AgnoneRobin A.j. Nicholassubject
Veterinary medicineAttenuated vaccineFood AnimalsThe Mycoplasmasmedicinemedia_common.cataloged_instanceAnimal Science and ZoologyMycoplasmaEuropean unionBiologymedicine.disease_causeVirologymedia_commondescription
Abstract An effective vaccine that improves the control of contagious agalactia in Mediterranean regions would be beneficial for poorer farmers who use traditional husbandry methods for sheep and goat production. However while there is little published data on the efficacy of commercially available vaccines for contagious agalactia, evidence from the field suggests that some provide inadequate protection. This paper compares four different vaccine formulations, including a widely used commercial vaccine, using clinical signs and mycoplasma excretion as measures of protection in sheep. Results showed that protection afforded by the vaccines, following contact challenge with experimentally infected ewes, varied considerably. A live attenuated vaccine, presently forbidden in the European Union, conferred the best clinical protection, despite a lack of serological response, followed by a vaccine prepared by inactivating the mycoplasmas with saponin. A commercial vaccine inactivated with formalin provided no protection against this disease.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-05-01 | Small Ruminant Research |