6533b85dfe1ef96bd12be041

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A Novel Na(I) Coordination Complex with s-Triazine Pincer Ligand: Synthesis, X-ray Structure, Hirshfeld Analysis, and Antimicrobial Activity

Amal YousriAyman El-fahamMatti HaukkaMohammed Salah AyoupMagda M. F. IsmailNagwan G. El MenofySaied M. SolimanLars ÖHrströmAssem BarakatMorsy A. M. Abu-youssef

subject

X-rayInorganic ChemistryNa(I) coordination complex; <i>s</i>-triazine pincer ligand; X-ray; Hirshfeld surface; antimicrobial activityantimicrobial activityHirshfeld surfaceGeneral Chemical EngineeringGeneral Materials ScienceNa(I) coordination complexs-triazine pincer ligandCondensed Matter Physics

description

The pincer ligand 2,4-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-6-methoxy-1,3,5-triazine (bpmt) was used to synthesize the novel [Na(bpmt)2][AuCl4] complex through the self-assembly method. In this complex, the Na(I) ion is hexa-coordinated with two tridentate N-pincer ligands (bpmt). The two bpmt ligand units are meridionally coordinated to Na(I) via one short Na-N(s-triazine) and two slightly longer Na-N(pyrazole) bonds, resulting in a distorted octahedral geometry around the Na(I) ion. In the coordinated bpmt ligand, the s-triazine core is not found to be coplanar with the two pyrazole moieties. Additionally, the two bpmt units are strongly twisted from one another by 64.94&deg;. Based on Hirshfeld investigations, the H&middot;&middot;&middot;H (53.4%) interactions have a significant role in controlling the supramolecular arrangement of the [Na(bpmt)2][AuCl4] complex. In addition, the Cl&middot;&middot;&middot;H (12.2%), C&middot;&middot;&middot;H (11.5%), N&middot;&middot;&middot;H (9.3%), and O&middot;&middot;&middot;H (4.9%) interactions are significant. Antimicrobial investigations revealed that the [Na(bpmt)2][AuCl4] complex has promising antibacterial and antifungal activities. The [Na(bpmt)2][AuCl4] complex showed enhanced antibacterial activity for the majority of the studied gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria compared to the free bpmt (MIC = 62.5&ndash;125 &micro;g/mL vs. MIC = 62.5&ndash;500 &micro;g/mL, respectively) and Amoxicillin (MIC &gt; 500 &micro;g/mL) as a positive control. Additionally, the [Na(bpmt)2][AuCl4] complex had better antifungal efficacy (MIC = 125 &micro;g/mL) against C. albicans compared to bpmt (MIC = 500 &micro;g/mL).

10.3390/cryst13060890https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cryst13060890