6533b85dfe1ef96bd12be874

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparison of Hybrid Blends for Solar Cell Application

Maria C. LechmannJochen S. GutmannDominik KollWolfgang TremelPatrick TheatoDaniel Kessler

subject

Control and OptimizationMaterials scienceEnergy Engineering and Power TechnologyPTPATriphenylaminelcsh:TechnologyRodP3HTlaw.inventionjel:Q40chemistry.chemical_compoundlawjel:Qjel:Q43Solar celljel:Q42jel:Q41jel:Q48jel:Q47Electrical and Electronic EngineeringEngineering (miscellaneous)jel:Q49Conductive polymerchemistry.chemical_classificationhybrid solar celllcsh:TRenewable Energy Sustainability and the EnvironmentPhotovoltaic systemjel:Q0PolymerHybrid solar celljel:Q4Nanocrystalline materialhybrid solar cell; P3HT; PTPA; ambient conditionchemistryChemical engineeringambient conditionEnergy (miscellaneous)

description

In blended hybrid systems distinct micro- or nanostructured materials can be formed by phase separation. Network structures of particles or rods in a polymer matrix can be developed via self-assembly. We use this blending approach to compare active materials for application in solar cell devices. Blends were fabricated from either poly(hexylthiophene) P3HT or poly(triphenylamine) PTPA mixed with nanocrystalline TiO 2 rods. In this manner, we compare two different hole conducting polymers in their performance in photovoltaic devices, while experimental conditions are kept identical. We find that the choice of solvent and photovoltaic characterization conducted in inert atmosphere is of importance for blends prepared from P3HT/TiO 2 blends, but not for PTPA/TiO 2 blends. Even though prepared with the same TiO 2 rods, solar cells prepared from PTPA blends showed an enhanced efficiency when measured under ambient conditions. Furthermore, the PTPA/TiO 2 showed higher long-term stability.

http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/3/3/301/