6533b85dfe1ef96bd12bf1aa

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The Family-Resemblances Framework for Mind-Wandering Remains Well Clad

Jonathan SmallwoodPaul SeliDavid MailletJonathan W. SchoolerDaniel L. SchacterMichael J. KaneDaniel SmilekThomas MetzingerThomas Metzinger

subject

Cognitive sciencePoint (typography)Cognitive Neuroscience05 social sciencesExperimental and Cognitive Psychology050105 experimental psychology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyFeature (computer vision)Mind-wandering0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesPsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Christoff et al. [1] reject our family-resemblances framework for mind-wandering research [2] and instead seek to characterize mind-wandering with a necessary defining feature. As an example, they point to their ‘dynamic framework’ [3] that defines mind-wandering as thoughts that ‘proceed in a relatively free, unconstrained fashion.’ We outline three primary points of disagreement with their commentary and two points of clarification on the family-resemblances framework.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.007