6533b85efe1ef96bd12bf30a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Feasibility and psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the measure of processes of care for adults

Ira JeglinskyAnna-liisa SalminenTimo TörmäkangasMaarit Karhula

subject

AdultMalepsychometricsGerontologyvuxna (myndiga)PsychometricsMeasure (physics)Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and RehabilitationklientarbetepotilaslähtöisyysYoung Adult03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSurveys and Questionnairesadultsmeasures (measurement)HumansTranslationsMusculoskeletal Diseases030212 general & internal medicinemetriklääkinnällinen kuntoutusFinlandmeasures of processes of care for adultsAgedta316Aged 80 and overInpatientsMental Disorders030503 health policy & servicesProcess Assessment Health CareRehabilitationReproducibility of Resultsta3141customer orientationNeuromuscular DiseasesMiddle AgedProcess of carepsykometriikkaFeasibility StudiesFemaleFactor Analysis Statistical0305 other medical sciencePsychologyarviointiclient-centeredInpatient rehabilitation

description

To assess the psychometric properties and feasibility of the Finnish translation of the measure of processes of care for adults (MPOC-A) when used in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.A feasibility study.Inpatient rehabilitation settings.A total of 858 people with severe neurological disabilities, musculoskeletal problems, and mental disorders were recruited to the study.The MPOC-A questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 34 items in five-factorial domains. The construct validity of the translated questionnaire was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. To compare the fit of the model to the fit of the independent null-model Comparative Fit Index was used. Internal consistency for the total scale and subscales was calculated using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient.A total of 554 people, mean age 52 years (SD = 9), participated in the study. Most of the responders had musculoskeletal problems ( n = 328, 57%). The respondents rated the client-centeredness in rehabilitation service as moderate ( m = 5.40, SD = 0.81). The five-factor and the one-factor model fitted the data well according to all three indices. Internal consistency showed high reliability between the one-factor and five-factor models for all except one domain (0.49-0.93). The mean for Person Infit for the people with neurological disabilities was higher than for the other two groups ( m = 1.77, SD = 1.32) indicating less predictable response patterns in this group.The results confirm the appropriate psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the MPOC-A, especially for people with musculoskeletal problems and those with mental health disorders.

10.1177/0269215518784334http://juuli.fi/Record/0333258418