6533b85efe1ef96bd12bf398

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Exploring User-Related Drivers of the Early Acceptance of Certified Digital Stress Prevention Programs in Germany.

Severin HennemannMarlies RiebschlägerMartin ZeißlerAlexandra WodnerChristina KückJennifer Apolinário-hagenBernhard BreilDorota Geibel

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyCertificationmedicine.disease_causeattitude to computers03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineNursingPrimary preventionacceptability of health caremedicineeHealthPsychological stress030212 general & internal medicineStress preventionmHealthpsychological stressOriginal Researchlcsh:R5-920Health PolicyPublic healthlcsh:Public aspects of medicinepublic healthPublic Health Environmental and Occupational Healthlcsh:RA1-1270Mental healthpreventive health servicesmHealthMental healtheHealthPsychologylcsh:Medicine (General)030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Electronic mental health services represent innovative instruments to increase the dissemination of stress programs in primary prevention. However, little is known about facilitators of their uptake. This study aimed to explore determinants of the acceptance of centrally certified digital stress coping programs and preferences for service delivery modes among adult members of German statutory health insurances. Participants completed a multi-construct 45-item questionnaire covering acceptance of digital stress prevention (behavioral use intention) and potential predictors we assessed using hierarchical regression analysis—(1) socio-demographic variables and time spent online, (2) openness to experience, (3) perceived stress, and (4) attitudes toward e-mental health. Preferences in terms of the willingness to use online, face-to-face and blended programs were analyzed using paired t-tests. Participants (N = 171, 66% female, 18-69 years) reported a moderate acceptance of digital stress management ( M = 2.76, SD = 1.16, range: 1-5). We identified younger age (ß = -0.16, P = .009), openness to experience (ß = 0.17, P = .003), and positive attitudes (ß = 0.61, P < .001) as predictors of acceptance ( R2 = .50, P < .001). Face-to-face was preferred over online (d = 0.40) and blended (d = 0.33), and blended over stand-alone online delivery mode (d = 0.19; all P < .001). Our findings indicate that promoting favorable attitudes toward digital stress prevention through tailored information may be a starting point to facilitate their adoption.

10.1177/1178632920911061https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32206013