6533b85efe1ef96bd12bfce1

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Teaching the Romanian neighbors Hungarian: language ideologies and the Debrecen Summer School

Attila Gyula Kiss

subject

Linguistics and LanguageDiscourse analysisStudy abroadLanguage and LinguisticsPedagogyEthnographykielilearning HungarianSociologyMass media060201 languages & linguisticsstudy abroadRomaniabusiness.industryhistorical minority languageCommunicationRomanianHungarian Language06 humanities and the artsdiscourse studylanguage.human_languageLinguisticslanguage ideologies0602 languages and literaturelanguageAttitude changebusinessideologiatQualitative research

description

AbstractThis article is a contribution to the hitherto scant literature on learning a historical minority language and on language ideologies in the context of a study abroad program in Hungary, Debrecen. I analyse the language ideologies of the decision makers in Hungary and in the Debrecen Summer School in relation to the teaching of Hungarian to the neighboring peoples. Drawing on interactional data of participants from Romania, the perspective of learning Hungarian as a historical minority language is examined. The present article combines a historical approach with language ideologies by focusing on an institution offering language education. Language ideologies are presented as they appear in the larger historical discourses, contemporary documents, and media interviews. I briefly outline the major turning points in the history of the institution which also reflects the changing language ideologies and cultural politics of Hungary. The qualitative discourse analysis of interviews and the conclusion of this ethnographic study demonstrate that language ideological positions in relation to the teaching and learning of Hungarian have been firmly located in historical and cultural contexts. Discourse analysis of various data demonstrates that, on the one hand, the course providers have espoused competing ideologies of who the learners should be as well as how to present the country and the culture, while, on the other hand, showing that the learners have had to negotiate prejudice and stereotype rooted in discourses about the often burdened history.

https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-1030