6533b85efe1ef96bd12c0561
RESEARCH PRODUCT
How does the brain encode epistemic reliability? Perceptual presence, phenomenal transparency, and counterfactual richness
Thomas Metzingersubject
Cognitive scienceCounterfactual thinkingCognitive Neurosciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectInternalism and externalismAmbiguityENCODEExperiential learningEpistemologyPerceptionUnavailabilityPsychologyPhenomenology (psychology)media_commonCognitive psychologydescription
AbstractSeth develops a convincing and detailed internalist alternative to the sensorimotor-contingency theory of perceptual phenomenology. However, there are remaining conceptual problems due to a semantic ambiguity in the notion of “presence” and the idea of “subjective veridicality.” The current model should be integrated with the earlier idea that experiential “realness” and “mind-independence” are determined by the unavailability of earlier processing stages to attention. Counterfactual richness and attentional unavailability may both be indicators of the overall processing level currently achieved, a functional property that normally correlates with epistemic reliability. Perceptual presence as well as phenomenal transparency express epistemic reliability on the level of conscious processing.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014-04-03 | Cognitive Neuroscience |