6533b860fe1ef96bd12c3151
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Obsolescence and intervention: on synthetic-biological entities.
Andrã©s Moyasubject
Histologybusiness.industryComputer sciencelcsh:BiotechnologyEvent (relativity)Biomedical EngineeringBioengineering and Biotechnologynatural entitiesBioengineeringEnvironmental ethicsOpinion ArticleBiotechnologySynthetic biologyIntervention (law)Obsolescencelcsh:TP248.13-248.65evolutionartificial entitiesState of the sciencebusinessmetabolismmachinesBiotechnologydescription
Oftentimes, topics that might fall outside of science’s remit seem to end up becoming a part of it, sooner or later. This appears to be the case of synthetic biology, a new biological science (although some maintain that it is a form of engineering, or treat it as such; Endy, 2005), which seems to have become essential to the understanding of living beings and their extreme manipulation. I believe it to be a new form of biology. In truth, synthetic biology has a long history and, conceptually speaking, may well have formed part of the interests and research efforts of our illustrious predecessors throughout the first half of the twentieth century and even earlier. In any event, and broadly speaking, it may be asserted that such efforts were premature and that the state of the science, at that time, did not allow for progress, in terms of the modification, creation, or re-creation of organisms or parts thereof that we have today. Now, it has rather come of age, which is why I think of synthetic biology as a young or new biological science (Moya, 2014).
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-11-26 | Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology |