6533b861fe1ef96bd12c5880

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Human voice pitch measures are robust across a variety of speech recordings: methodological and theoretical implications

Piotr SorokowskiKatarzyna PisanskiAgata Groyecka-bernardAgata Groyecka-bernard

subject

AdultMale0106 biological sciencesVoice pitchspeech[SHS.ANTHRO-BIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Biological anthropologyBiology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesSpeech Acousticsbiomechanics03 medical and health sciencesNonverbal communicationsource-filter theoryHumanssexual selectionHuman voice030304 developmental biology0303 health sciencesCommunication[SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statisticsbusiness.industryevolution fundamental frequencyFundamental frequencyVariety (linguistics)Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)behaviourSalientSexual selection[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/PsychologyVoicenonverbal communicationFemaleAnimal BehaviourGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciencesbusiness

description

Fundamental frequency ( f o ), perceived as voice pitch, is the most sexually dimorphic, perceptually salient and intensively studied voice parameter in human nonverbal communication. Thousands of studies have linked human f o to biological and social speaker traits and life outcomes, from reproductive to economic. Critically, researchers have used myriad speech stimuli to measure f o and infer its functional relevance, from individual vowels to longer bouts of spontaneous speech. Here, we acoustically analysed f o in nearly 1000 affectively neutral speech utterances (vowels, words, counting, greetings, read paragraphs and free spontaneous speech) produced by the same 154 men and women, aged 18–67, with two aims: first, to test the methodological validity of comparing f o measures from diverse speech stimuli, and second, to test the prediction that the vast inter-individual differences in habitual f o found between same-sex adults are preserved across speech types. Indeed, despite differences in linguistic content, duration, scripted or spontan­­eous production and within-individual variability, we show that 42–81% of inter-individual differences in f o can be explained between any two speech types. Beyond methodological implications, together with recent evidence that inter-individual differences in f o are remarkably stable across the lifespan and generalize to emotional speech and nonverbal vocalizations, our results further substantiate voice pitch as a robust and reliable biomarker in human communication.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0356