6533b86dfe1ef96bd12ca182

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Identification of differential risk hotspots for collision and vehicle type in a directed linear network

ÁLvaro Briz-redónFrancisco MontesFrancisco Martínez-ruiz

subject

Computer scienceKernel density estimationPoison controlHuman Factors and Ergonomicscomputer.software_genreRisk Assessment0502 economics and businessHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesBuilt EnvironmentSafety Risk Reliability and QualitySpatial analysis050107 human factorsSpatial Analysis050210 logistics & transportation05 social sciencesAccidents TrafficPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthDifferential (mechanical device)CollisionMotor VehiclesIdentification (information)SpainSample size determinationData miningRisk assessmentMonte Carlo Methodcomputer

description

Traffic accidents can take place in very different ways and involve a substantially distinct number and types of vehicles. Thus, it is of interest to know which parts of a road structure present an overrepresentation of a specific type of traffic accident, specially for some typologies of collisions and vehicles that tend to trigger more severe consequences for the users being involved. In this study, a spatial approach is followed to estimate the risk that different types of collisions and vehicles present in the central area of Valencia (Spain), considering the accidents observed in this city during the period 2014-2017. A directed spatial linear network representing the non-pedestrian road structure of the area of interest was employed to guarantee an accurate analysis of the point pattern. A kernel density estimation technique was used to approximate the probability of risk along the network for each collision and vehicle type. A procedure based on these estimates and the sample size locally available within the network was designed and tested to determine a set of differential risk hotspots for each typology of accident considered. A Monte Carlo based simulation process was then defined to assess the statistical significance of each of the differential risk hotspots found, allowing the elaboration of rankings of importance and the possible rejection of the least significant ones.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105278