6533b871fe1ef96bd12d0bc8
RESEARCH PRODUCT
New Labour and Devolution: radicalism or bricolage?
Keith Dixonsubject
néo-travaillismedévolution[SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science[SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political sciencenationalisme écossaisnationalisme galloisdescription
This paper argues that New Labour's devolution proposals can be seen as part of a strategy of « political distinction » from the Conservative party, all the more necessary as there had been a conspicuous convergence in most other policy areas. After retracing the history of Labour attitudes towards Home Rule on the periphery of the United Kingdom in the XXth century, the paper focuses on the contemporary period, suggesting that Thatcherism was perceived as an “alien” doctrine in both Scotland and Wales, thus hardening the resolve of a significant part of the population to loosen or break the old constitutional ties. It is against this background that New Labour's positioning as the party of movement is discussed. It is argued that, in Scotland, two factors contributed to making constitutional reform unavoidable from the 1980s on : a major shift in favour of Scottish autonomy in both the cultural and intellectual fields and the creation of a “popular front” in favour of constitutional reform in the shape of the Scottish Constitutional Convention. The paper concludes on a discussion of the contrasting positions of Vernon Bogdanor and Tom Nairn of the state that the United Kingdom is in today.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-03-20 |