6533b871fe1ef96bd12d11c2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Using field measurements and FAO-56 model to assess the eco-physiological response of citrus orchards under regulated deficit irrigation

Pablo González-altozanoGiuseppe ProvenzanoJuan Manzano-juárezGiovanni Rallo

subject

IrrigationCitrus0208 environmental biotechnologyDeficit irrigationFAO-56 model Midday stem water potential Regulated deficit irrigation Water stress function CitrusSoil ScienceMidday stem water potential02 engineering and technologyAgricultural engineeringFAO-56 modelRegulated deficit irrigationCropSettore AGR/08 - Idraulica Agraria E Sistemazioni Idraulico-ForestaliWater-use efficiencyIrrigation managementEarth-Surface ProcessesWater Science and TechnologyWater stress functionCrop yieldIrrigation scheduling04 agricultural and veterinary sciences020801 environmental engineeringAgronomySoil water040103 agronomy & agriculture0401 agriculture forestry and fisheriesEnvironmental scienceINGENIERIA AGROFORESTALAgronomy and Crop Science

description

[EN] Micro-irrigation is considered one of the most efficient water distribution systems and allows increasing water use efficiency if coupled with effective water-saving irrigation management strategies as regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) or partial root-zone drying (PRD) techniques. However, application of these strategies makes it crucial the real-time monitoring of soil and crop water status, in order to identify appropriate irrigation scheduling parameters (irrigation timing and doses) and to prevent irreversible damage of plant system and/or crop yield reductions. Even if midday stem water potential (MSWP) is considered one of the most affordable indicator for direct determinations of crop water status, its measurement requires skilled operators, is destructive and time consuming, so that indirect and fast estimations are desirable. In this direction, agro-hydrological models can be considered an easy-to-use tool for indirect evaluations of soil and crop water status aimed to identify irrigation scheduling parameters even when micro-irrigation distribution systems and water saving management strategies are adopted. The paper, after examining the eco-physiological response of citrus orchards to soil water deficit, assessed the potential of FAO-56 agro-hydrological modelto identify the crop water stress under different irrigation management strategies. Experiments carried out during three years (2009–2011) allowed identifying the crop water stress response to soil water deficit conditions, also confirming the schematization proposed in FAO-56 paper for citrus orchards. Moreover, after evaluating the similarity between the measured MSWP with the simulated crop water stress coefficient, Ks, it was proved the fairly good performance of FAO-56 agrohydrological model to predict soil water content (RMSE = 0.04 m3 m−3), from one side, and the crop response to different irrigation management strategies, from the other. The obtained results evidenced that the crop water stress coefficient estimated by the model can be used as a suitable indicator to replace the tedious and time-consuming field measurements of MSWP. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

yearjournalcountryeditionlanguage
2017-01-31
10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.011http://hdl.handle.net/11568/816298