6533b871fe1ef96bd12d253e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS): Optimal cut points for remission and response in a German sample
Wolfgang HillerJuergen HoyerFalk LeichsenringUlrike WillutzkiUlrich StangierE. LeibingGerrit HirschfeldM. Von Glischinskisubject
AdultMalePsychometricsLiebowitz social anxiety scaleSensitivity and Specificitylaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawGermanyHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReceiver operating characteristicRemission InductionSocial anxietyNonparametric statisticsReproducibility of ResultsPhobia SocialGold standard (test)030227 psychiatryPsychotherapyClinical PsychologyTreatment OutcomeClinical researchFemalePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryCut-pointClinical psychologydescription
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) is the most frequently used instrument to assess social anxiety disorder (SAD) in clinical research and practice. Both a self-reported (LSAS-SR) and a clinician-administered (LSAS-CA) version are available. The aim of the present study was to define optimal cut-off (OC) scores for remission and response to treatment for the LSAS in a German sample. Data of N = 311 patients with SAD were used who had completed psychotherapeutic treatment within a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Diagnosis of SAD and reduction in symptom severity according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, served as gold standard. OCs yielding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity were determined using receiver operating characteristics. The variability of the resulting OCs was estimated by nonparametric bootstrapping. Using diagnosis of SAD (present vs. absent) as a criterion, results for remission indicated cut-off values of 35 for the LSAS-SR and 30 for the LSAS-CA, with acceptable sensitivity (LSAS-SR: .83, LSAS-CA: .88) and specificity (LSAS-SR: .82, LSAS-CA: .87). For detection of response to treatment, assessed by a 1-point reduction in the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, rating, a reduction of 28% for the LSAS-SR and 29% for the LSAS-CA yielded the best balance between sensitivity (LSAS-SR: .75, LSAS-CA: .83) and specificity (LSAS-SR: .76, LSAS-CA: .80). To our knowledge, we are the first to define cut points for the LSAS in a German sample. Overall, the cut points for remission and response corroborate previously reported cut points, now building on a broader data basis.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-05-29 | Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy |