Search results for " FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO"

showing 10 items of 630 documents

Genealogia della normatività. La normatività come controllo

2018

In this paper I draw the outline of a psychological genealogy of normativity: an account of normativity as a complex neuro-psychological fact, entirely analysable in non-normative terms. As a first step, I introduce two of the main problems faced by the genealogical approach. I call the first one “Gibbard problem”: what kind of neuro-psychological state is normative judgment? I call the second one “irreducibility of normativity problem”: normative dynamics seem to be irreducible to causal dynamics. As a second step, I examine the “dual model” of the psychology of normative judgment developed by J. Haidt and J. Greene. I argue that the dual model is not able to solve the aforementioned probl…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPsychology of normativity psychology of decision-making normative judgment reasons and causes naturalization of normativitySettore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia MoraleSettore M-PSI/05 - Psicologia Sociale
researchProduct

Negoziare ed argomentare in tema d'identità e di valori

2013

L'articolo mira ad esplorare l'uso della negoziazione e dell'argomentazione nel riconoscimento delle idendità e dei valori da parte della comunità politica

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic ReasonArgumentationIdentitieNegotiationValue
researchProduct

La vía europea de la razón pública

2012

El futuro de Europa es una cuestión que aglutina todas las energías y recursos culturales, sin excluir a nadie. El elevado grado de conflictualidad presente en Europa se ha debido en buena parte a la consolidación de formas de vida nacionales, ligadas auna larga elaboración histórica en la que los aspectos religiosos y civiles se han entrelazado de modo inextricable. La amenaza representada por reivindicaciones de libertades despreocupadas del bien común invierte la óptica rawlsiana de la razón pública. ¿Cómo sociedades políticas preexistentes pueden acoger el pluralismo sin ser abrumadas por una progresiva e ineluctable fragmentación de la esfera pública?. La vía europea de la razón públic…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic ReasonPublic ReasonableneRazón públicaCivil SocietyJusticiaPluralismÉticaImmunology and AllergyConstitucionalismoConstitutionalismPluralismo
researchProduct

La fine dell'età dei diritti

2013

Norberto Bobbio’s introduced the expression “age of rights” to indicate the idea of an universal consensus on some values which can be interpreted as a signum prognosticum – in kantian terms – of mankind’s moral progress. The symbolic starting point of this age is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed in 1948. In this paper the expression “the end of the age of rights” is value free and it is used to sign the replacement of the model of social organization imagined by Bobbio and many others after the second world-war in favour of a different model according to which human rights become a sort of lingua franca. As a consequence, it is not paradoxically at all to decree the end…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic ReasonRights’ MinimalismPluralismConstitutional StatesHuman Right
researchProduct

A Just Criminalization of Irregular Immigration: Is It Possible?

2015

The aim of this paper is to question, from the perspective of a principled theory of criminalization, the legitimacy of making irregular immigration (IM) a crime. In order to do this, I identify three main ways in which the political decision to introduce a crime of IM may be defended: according to the first, IM is a malum in se the wrongness of which resides in its being a violation of states’ territorial sovereignty; according to the second, IM is a justified malum prohibitum the wrongness of which resides in its being a violation of a justified immigration regulation; according to the third, IM is a malum in se the wrongness of which resides in its harmful consequences for receiving stat…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic harms and collective harmmedia_common.quotation_subjectImmigration0603 philosophy ethics and religionCriminalizationTerritorial sovereignty and “home analogy”SovereigntyState (polity)ArgumentSociologyAntony Duff’s account of mala prohibita crimeLegitimacy0505 lawmedia_common050502 lawIrregular immigration (IM)05 social sciences06 humanities and the artsPhilosophyHarmLaw060302 philosophyAccumulative harmfulness versus precautionary responsibilityPhilosophy of lawCriminalization theoryLawSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penale
researchProduct

Le conseguenze del relativismo

2011

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRELATIVISMO - EPISTEMOLOGIA - SIGNIFICATO
researchProduct

Educare alla ragione pubblica

2010

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRagione pubblica
researchProduct

Rawls e il diritto

2013

.

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRawlLegal and Political Philosophy
researchProduct

Comparative vs. Transcendental Approaches to Justice: A Misleading Dichotomy in Sen’s The Idea of Justice

2012

In this paper I try to put under scrutiny the distinction offered by A. Sen between transcendental and comparative theories of justice, and its application to Rawls’ doctrine. After presenting Sen’s arguments, I will put forward three theses. First, Sen offers a limited portrait of Rawls’ doctrine. This limitation is the result of a rhetorical strategy that depicts Rawlsian doctrine as more “transcendental” than it really is. Although Sen presents a large number of quotations in order to validate his interpretation, it is possible to offer a different, less transcendental, interpretation of Rawls’ doctrine. Secondly, the dichotomy between transcendental and comparative approaches to questio…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRawlSenPolitical liberalism.distributive justiceMetaethic
researchProduct

Desobediencia civil y participación política. Unas cuestiones abiertas para las democracias constitucionales (y la teoría del derecho)

2015

In this article I try to show some problems of the interpretation of civil disobedience as a practice that aims to maintain democratic principles against discriminative legal patterns or oligarchic forces. I will present two doctrines, the Rawlsian (followed by Habermas) and the one proposed recently by supporters of a radical constitutional change through the exercise of “constituent power”. The Rawlsian account a) offers a too stringent model of justification of this type of practice and b) does not recognize the plurality of subjects to which civil disobedience appeal. The supporters of radical constitutional change fall into a form of heterogony of ends. They reject liberal accounts of …

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRawls models of democracy civil disobedience constituent power separation of powers.
researchProduct