Search results for " FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO"
showing 10 items of 630 documents
Is Martha Nussbaum really political liberal?
2008
This paper puts under scrutiny Martha Nussbaum’s turn to political liberalism. Unlike Rawls, she seems to assume that overlapping consensus works even within societies without democratic constitutions. Though, this sort of consensus is doomed to be unstable, since there is not a previous constitutional consensus, as Rawls requires. Unlike Rawls’ constructivist theory, her conception of political liberalism is more akin to forms of moral objectivism. Moreover, her allegation of gender discrimination towards institutions that let only men run for certain jobs (such as presidency of certain catholic universities) is based on a clear cut distinction between public and private sphere. However, “…
Tre osservazioni su diez tesis acerca de la coherencia en el Derecho
2021
El artículo está dedicado a tres observaciones críticas sobre la concepción de la coherencia defendida por Amaya. Estas observaciones se refieren a: a) la supuesta incompatibilidad entre la coherencia y la concepción instrumental de la razón práctica; b) la aspiración a la best explanation y, finalmente, c) al vínculo entre la coherencia y la responsabilidad epistémica.
Contestualismo e teoria dell'interpretazione. Risposte ai miei critici
2013
ERMENEUSI E DIRITTO
2013
This essay discusses Heidegger’s hermeneutical phenomenology and hermeneutical circle through juridical interpretation. The purpose is to show how jurists, judges and lawmakers can make, by means of juridical interpretation, more prolific the same hermeneutical circle. It’s about the vitality opposed to static nature of opus magnum Sein und Zeit’s hermeneutical circle. New perspective examines in depth Heidegger’s hermeneutical phenomenology, compared to Husserl’s understanding, and develops in different fields of study, such as theology, psychoanalysis, and the same law.
Una teoria pragmatica del diritto
2012
Il saggio prende in esame la teoria del diritto costituzionalista di Luigi Ferrajoli. Nel criticare le teorie del diritto anglosassoni, che vanno oggi per la maggiore, l'autore sottolinea l'utilità di una teoria pragmatica del diritto che sia adeguata all'esperienza giuridica del mondo latino. Una teoria che stabilisca una certa connessione tra diritto e morale e riconosca il ruolo che nel diritto hanno i principi, da sottoporre a bilanciamento, oltre alle regole. Il ruolo dei principi rende manifesto che nel diritto sono importanti non soltanto i riferimenti all'autorità, ma anche ai valori morali.
Per una ricostruzione del concetto di bioetica
2020
By means of a critical investigation of the concept of bioethics starting from Potter’s work, the present essay intends to highlight aporias and paradoxes in the dominant construction in the literature of the sector. The line of argumentation aims to point out that the current concept of bioethics is not able to meet the regulatory expectations that have arisen around it. In the pars construens of the essay I will try to trace the way for a reconstruction of the concept of bioethics, bringing it closer to the origins of Fritz Jahr’s speculation and to the traditional notion of ethics, intended as a reflective science rather than a pragmatic discipline.
Fundamental rights and the proportionality principle
2017
The paper assesses the widespread use of the test of proportionality in fundamental rights adjudication. While constitutional and human rights courts all over the world appear to be consistently engaged in deploying the test of proportionality in order to assess the permissibility of a given rights limitation, this approach is under severe criticism insofar as it is considered an attack to the very idea of fundamental rights. The paper will discuss this criticism of the use of proportionality, and will provide a defense of its use by courts in light of some basic features of the contemporary discourse of fundamental rights. El artículo evalúa el uso generalizado de la prueba de proporcional…
Eight Questions for the Speakers
2019
In this paper, we raise a few questions for Bartosz Brozek, Monica Bucciarelli and Philip Johnson-Laird. The questions we ask to Bucciarelli and Johnson-Laird concern the nature of the “sense of correctness” which is at the heart of our normative judgments and reasoning, and the status of the laws of logic relating to mental models. Our questions to Brozek concern the distinction he traces between rudimentary and abstract rules, the role of language in normative behaviour, and the role of mental simulation in the understanding of abstract rules.
Ai ricci importa la salute pubblica? La teoria dei diritti di Dworkin, i beni pubblici e le sfide della pandemia
2023
In this paper, after offering a short vindication of public health as public good that liberal government should guarantee, I will show why Ronald Dworkin’s theory of justice in health care does not offer guidance in two cases that arise in pandemics: 1) how to set priorities in rationing access to intense care unit, 2) how to choose between vaccination policies. This lack of guidance is due to an unrealistic assumption that follows from Dworkin’s idea of the unity of value: that it is always possible to strike a balance between individual rights and collective claims in maintaining a public good (in this case public health).
contra raz su autorità, autonomia e razionalità
2019
In this article, I first argue that the necessity to solve coordination problems in the wide sense does not imply the necessity of a legitimate Razian authority. Second, I claim that the Razian conception of a legitimate authority is incompatible with a plausible conception of rationality and autonomy.