Search results for " Reason"

showing 10 items of 465 documents

Pilar Zambrano. PRINCÍPI, RAGIONI E DIRITTI. UN APPROCCIO AL DIRITTO COME DIFFERENZA PRATICA

2013

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoAuthority Practical Reason Interpretation Fundamental Rights Moral Absolutes
researchProduct

Pensare e ragionare da giuristi: interpretazione e ragionamento giuridico

2010

The article examines the concept and practice of interpretation in the light of legal reasoning. The authoritative nature of legal reasoning determines the role and methods of interpretative work.

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoAuthorityInterpretationLegal Reasoning
researchProduct

Derrotabilidad y ponderación. Sobre la posibilidad de revisiones estables

2012

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoDefeasibility Legal principles Legal rihts Balancing Legal reasoning
researchProduct

True Exceptions:Defeasibility and Particularism

2012

Sometimes, kinds of cases which do in fact fall under the antecedent of a conditional norm are reckoned recalcitrant. I.e., although they fall under the antecedent of the norm we do not wish to allow the consequence to follow. In such cases, we sometimes say that we are abandoning, or discarding, the norm. We concede, that is, that the alleged norm was wrong (or, if you wish, that it was no norm at all). At other times, however, it is claimed that the norm is a defeasible one. Granted, the case at hand is one of those in which the norm is defeated; but this, it is implied, does not amount to a wholesale abandonment of the norm itself. Being defeasible, the norm somehow survives the impact o…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoDefeasibility Particularism Practical reasoning Norms Rules
researchProduct

Ragionamento giuridico. Particolarismo. In difesa di un approccio psicologistico

2017

Legal Reasoning, Particularism: In Defense of a Psychologistic Approach. In this paper I recommend a close examination of the reasons favouring a deep and potentially far reaching reorientation of legal theory, and of the theory of norms and norm-based reasoning and decision-making generally, namely, the adoption of a psychologistic approach (“psychodeontics”). I argue in favour of psychologism - not in the anstract, but - with reference to rwo particular topics: legal reasoning (specifically, the justification of judicial decisions) and the project of a of two-tier (principles v. rules) theory of law, informed by a particularistic conception of practical reasoning. I show that there are as…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoLegal reasoning Normativity Psychologism Particularism Exceptions
researchProduct

Genealogia della normatività. La normatività come controllo

2018

In this paper I draw the outline of a psychological genealogy of normativity: an account of normativity as a complex neuro-psychological fact, entirely analysable in non-normative terms. As a first step, I introduce two of the main problems faced by the genealogical approach. I call the first one “Gibbard problem”: what kind of neuro-psychological state is normative judgment? I call the second one “irreducibility of normativity problem”: normative dynamics seem to be irreducible to causal dynamics. As a second step, I examine the “dual model” of the psychology of normative judgment developed by J. Haidt and J. Greene. I argue that the dual model is not able to solve the aforementioned probl…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPsychology of normativity psychology of decision-making normative judgment reasons and causes naturalization of normativitySettore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia MoraleSettore M-PSI/05 - Psicologia Sociale
researchProduct

Negoziare ed argomentare in tema d'identità e di valori

2013

L'articolo mira ad esplorare l'uso della negoziazione e dell'argomentazione nel riconoscimento delle idendità e dei valori da parte della comunità politica

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic ReasonArgumentationIdentitieNegotiationValue
researchProduct

La vía europea de la razón pública

2012

El futuro de Europa es una cuestión que aglutina todas las energías y recursos culturales, sin excluir a nadie. El elevado grado de conflictualidad presente en Europa se ha debido en buena parte a la consolidación de formas de vida nacionales, ligadas auna larga elaboración histórica en la que los aspectos religiosos y civiles se han entrelazado de modo inextricable. La amenaza representada por reivindicaciones de libertades despreocupadas del bien común invierte la óptica rawlsiana de la razón pública. ¿Cómo sociedades políticas preexistentes pueden acoger el pluralismo sin ser abrumadas por una progresiva e ineluctable fragmentación de la esfera pública?. La vía europea de la razón públic…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic ReasonPublic ReasonableneRazón públicaCivil SocietyJusticiaPluralismÉticaImmunology and AllergyConstitucionalismoConstitutionalismPluralismo
researchProduct

La fine dell'età dei diritti

2013

Norberto Bobbio’s introduced the expression “age of rights” to indicate the idea of an universal consensus on some values which can be interpreted as a signum prognosticum – in kantian terms – of mankind’s moral progress. The symbolic starting point of this age is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed in 1948. In this paper the expression “the end of the age of rights” is value free and it is used to sign the replacement of the model of social organization imagined by Bobbio and many others after the second world-war in favour of a different model according to which human rights become a sort of lingua franca. As a consequence, it is not paradoxically at all to decree the end…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoPublic ReasonRights’ MinimalismPluralismConstitutional StatesHuman Right
researchProduct

Reasons, Rules, Exceptions. Towards a Psychological Account

2018

In this paper we defend a psychological account of rule-based reasoning, specifically of the relationship between rules and exceptions. The topic of our inquiry are the relations between rules, the reasons underlying them, and exceptions. In analysing these relations, first, we outline an apparent paradox, the “paradox of rules”, and a related problem, the “problem of reconsideration”. Then, we propose a solution to, or better dissolution of, the paradox, grounded in an account of the psychological processes underlying rule-application and reconsideration. We claim, that is, that the problem of reconsideration should be answered by appealing to matters of sheer psychological fact. The upsho…

Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del DirittoRules. Exceptions. Particularism. Psychologism. Rule-based reasoning.Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
researchProduct