Search results for "Axel"
showing 10 items of 257 documents
ANGIOMET: Analysis of the correlations between angiogenic markers and outcome in patients (p) with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) treated with…
2014
e19014 Background: In NS-NSCLC CPB achieved median OS > 1 y and supported use of B. A broad range of predictive/prognostic markers explored for B use. In VEGF pathway ligands and receptors play an ...
Exploratory outcome analyses according to stage and residual disease in the ICON7 trial of front-line carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) ± bevacizumab (BEV)…
2015
5548 Background: In ICON7, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved in patients (pts) receiving BEV with front-line CP and continued as a single agent [Perren 2011] but no overall...
Feasibility and tolerability of sequential doxorubicin/paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and its effects on tum…
2005
Abstract Purpose: The European Cooperative Trial in Operable breast cancer (ECTO) randomly tested whether efficacy of adjuvant doxorubicin followed by i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF; doxorubicin → CMF, arm A) could be improved by adding paclitaxel (doxorubicin/paclitaxel → CMF) as adjuvant (arm B) or primary systemic therapy (PST, arm C). We report here feasibility, tolerability, locoregional antitumor activity, and breast conservation rate. Methods: A total of 1,355 women entered the study. Feasibility and safety were compared in arm A versus arms B plus C. Surgical findings were compared in arms A plus B versus arm C. Results: Grade 3 or 4 National Cancer Insti…
Third-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a feasible therapeutic option?
2010
Two decades ago best supportive care was considered a valid therapeutic option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients until the evidence derived from meta-analysis showed symptom improvement and a survival advantage from systemic chemotherapy. A further advantage was reported when docetaxel and pemetrexed were used as second-line treatment after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, the biologic therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor – erlotinib and gefitinib – have modified the therapeutic approach to second- and third-line treatment of NSCLC patients. In fact, to date, erlotinib is the only drug to be licensed for third-line th…
Gemcitabine-based doublets versus single-agent therapy for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a Literature-based Meta-analysis.
2009
BACKGROUND: Although platinum-based combinations are considered the best option of care for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), single-agent therapy is the preferred treatment for older patients. Since the late 1990s, various combinations of third-generation agents (gemcitabine [G], vinorelbine, docetaxel, and paclitaxel) have been tested, yielding contradictory results. The authors of this report performed a literature-based meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of G-based doublets compared with single-agent chemotherapy for elderly patients with NSCLC. METHODS: Data from all published, randomized, phase 3 trials that compared a G-based doublet with a …
A phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma: Analysis of peripheral neuropat…
2013
e20025 Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common side effect associated with taxane treatment. In a phase III trial, nab-paclitaxel vs dacarbazine demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (4.8 vs 2.5 months; P = 0.044) and at the interim survival analysis, a trend toward prolonged overall survival (12.8 vs 10.7 months; P = 0.094) for the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Here we report on the PN profile of nab-paclitaxel in this phase III trial. Methods: Pts (median age, 63 years) with chemotherapy-naive stage IV melanoma (M1c stage, 65%; elevated LDH, 28%) and an ECOG performance status 0-1 were randomized to nab-paclita…
Five-year analysis of the phase II NeoSphere trial evaluating four cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel (D) and/or trastuzumab (T) and/or pertuzumab (P).
2015
505 Background: InNeoSphere, four cycles of T+D, P+T+D, P+T, or P+D, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy plus conventional T, were evaluated in 417 women with locally advanced, inflammato...
Final results of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic marker in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with Nab-paclitaxel plus …
2016
e15737Background: Pancreatic cancer is the ninth most common cancer and the forth cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. New regimens have increased overall survival, but it still remains ext...
Three-arm randomized phase II study evaluating oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus gemcitabin…
2014
1044 Background: Combination chemotherapy (CT) is among the standard treatment options in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), especially in patients (pts) with visceral metastases or need of rapid symp...
Freedom from progression (FFP) by adding paclitaxel (T) to doxorubicin (A) followed by CMF as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: 10-yr results of …
2013
537 Background: At the time the ECTO was designed in 1996, taxanes were only indicated for patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, paclitaxel and docetaxel were still to be tested in the adjuvant setting. In addition there was relatively scarce information on the comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens. The ECTO trial was designed to evaluate the addition of paclitaxel to an anthracycline-based adjuvant regimen and to compare this combination with the same regimen given as primary systemic (neoadjuvant) therapy. Methods: A total of 1,355 women with operable breast cancer were randomized to one of three treatments: 1) surgery followed by adjuvant single agent doxo…