Search results for "C72"

showing 4 items of 14 documents

Conflict, Evolution, Hegemony, and the Power of the State

2013

In a model of evolution driven by conflict between societies more powerful states have an advantage. When the influence of outsiders is small we show that this results in a tendency to hegemony. In a simple example in which institutions differ in their “exclusiveness” we find that these hegemonies will be inefficiently “extractive” in the sense of having inefficiently high taxes, high compensation for state officials, and low welfare.

jel:C70jel:A10jel:D73jel:D63jel:D74jel:C72jel:D71jel:C73jel:D61jel:D72jel:D00jel:D01jel:D78jel:D42jel:C00jel:D02jel:D03jel:D0jel:C0jel:A0jel:D3jel:A1Game theory
researchProduct

Endogenous firm asymmetry and cooperative R&D in linear duopoly with spillovers

2005

In a linear model ofcost reducing R&D/Cournot competition, firm asymmetry is shown to be sustainable as subgame perfect Nash equilibrium with R&D competition only ifthe productivity of research is sufficiently large relative to the benefits from imitation. In such a case, industry-wide cost reduction and firms asymmetry are increasing and decreasing functions of the spillover rate, respectively. In the absence of spillovers, a symmetric joint lab generates higher consumer surplus and social welfare than a pair ofasymmetric competitors. If spillovers are not too small, asymmetric R&D competition is advantageous toconsumers, but not to firms.

jel:C72jel:L13jel:O32endogenous asymmetry Cournot instability R&D cooperation
researchProduct

Reciprocity, matching and conditional cooperation in two public goods games

2005

Previous experimental and empirical evidence has identified social preferences in the voluntary provision of public goods. A number of competing models of such preferences have been proposed. We provide evidence for one model of behavior in these games, reciprocity (or matching, or conditional cooperation). Consistent with previous research, we find that participants in the voluntary contribution mechanism attempt to match the contributions of others in their group. We also examine participants in a related game with different equilibria, the weakest-link mechanism. Here, in contrast, participants contribute so as to match the minimum contribution of others in their group.

jel:C92Economics and EconometricsMatching (statistics)jel:C72jel:D44Contrast (statistics)jel:H41Strong reciprocityExperimental economicsPublic goodExperimental economics public goods voluntary contribution mechanism weakest link mechanism reciprocitySocial preferencesMicroeconomicsReciprocity (social psychology)EconomicsEmpirical evidenceFinanceEconomics Letters
researchProduct

Delegated agency in multiproduct oligopolies with indivisible goods

2010

This paper focuses on oligopolistic markets in which indivisible goods are sold by multiproduct firms to a continuum of homogeneous buyers, with measure normalized to one, who have preferences over bundles of products. Our analysis contributes to the literature on delegated agency games with direct externalities and complete information, extending the insights by Berheim and Whinston (1986, a , b) to markets with indivisibilities. By analyzing a kind of extended contract schedules - mixed bundling prices - that discriminate on exclusivity, the paper shows that efficient equilibria always exist in such settings. There may also exist inefficient equilibria in which the agent chooses a subopti…

jel:D41jel:C72jel:L13jel:D21jel:D43Multiproduct Price Competition Delegated Agency Games Mixed Bundling Prices Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium Strong Equilibrium
researchProduct