Search results for "Criminal procedure"

showing 10 items of 50 documents

Właściwość sądów w sprawach karnych w Polsce w latach 1928-1939

2013

The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1928 provided three types of jurisdiction: material, topical and functional. In general, legal solutions adopted in the Code including provisions on material jurisdiction should be viewed positively. The regulations covered all the cases the Polish courts could hypothetically come across in practice, procedurally solving many issues connected with it. The most important cases included: the invalidity of judgments issued by the improper court, the jurisdiction of the magistrates courts, the determination of the topical jurisdiction of the courts, the aggregate consideration of cases, and resolving conflicts of jurisdiction between common and military courts.…

criminal casedisputes of jurisdictionCode of Criminal Procedurejurisdiction in criminal casesActa Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Prawo
researchProduct

Juridiskā zinātne, Nr. 12

2019

The publishing of Journal “Law” of the University of Latvia is financed by the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. The publishing of issue No. 11 is supported by “Eversheds Sutherland Bitāns” Law Office.

eIDAS Regulationlegal education - University of Latviapublic assets - Latvia:LAW/JURISPRUDENCE [Research Subject Categories]principle of duty of care - Latviaseparated ownershipaccessorinesStaatsfreiheit der Parteien - Deutschlandabnormally dangerous activitiesgender equality - Latviacriminal procedure - directives of the European Parliament and of the Council procedural guaranteestax law - Latviaconstitutional changes - Polandpolitical party funding - Germanylaw making - Estonia
researchProduct

La regola di giudizio nel patteggiamento tra cursus ordinario e revisione

2022

The article aims to deepen a fundamental and much debated profile in relation to the special rite of the Italian patteggiamento. In particular, the Author, in the light of an analysis of the undoubted particularities of the judicial mechanism of application of penalty upon request of the parties, intends to focus on the essence and the operation that the judgment rule assumes, respectively, in the ordinary cursus of criminal proceeding and in therevision, trying to offer an interpretative reconstruction that is able to reconcile the (substantial) needs of justice and the (formal) reasons for systematic coherence.

fair trialcriminal justice systemcriminal proceedings.Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penalerelevant and admissible evidenceSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penalecriminal procedure
researchProduct

L’incertezza probatoria tra poteri istruttori del giudice dibattimentale e regola decisoria del giudizio penale

2021

L’articolo affronta la questione delle relazioni sistemiche tra l’esercizio dei poteri del giudice di integrazione del materiale probatorio in dibattimento e la regola decisoria del giudizio penale sottesa al principio in dubio pro reo. In particolare, l’Autore intende approfondire la connotazione ontologica e il profilo operativo dell’incertezza probatoria capace di giustificare, rispettivamente, i poteri istruttori del giudice del dibattimento di primo grado e la decisione di assoluzione dell’imputato. The article addresses the issue of the systemic relationship between the exercise of the judge’s powers to integrate evidentiary materials at trial and the decision-making rule of the crimi…

fair trialevidenceSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penalecriminal procedure
researchProduct

Analiza śledcza jako dowód w procesie karnym

2017

investigation analysisinvestigationright to defenceprocedural guaranteescriminal procedureOpolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
researchProduct

Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law

2013

In questo articolo mi propongo di effettuare una valutazione normativa, dal punto di vista di una teoria del diritto penale orientata secondo principi, delle norme che incriminano l'immigrazione irregolare. L'interrogativo generale sul quale mi soffermerò è questo: che modo di usare il diritto penale è implicato nella emanazione di simili norme? La mia tesi è, in sintesi, che si tratta di un vero e proprio abuso del diritto penale. In almeno due sensi: primo, nel senso che, criminalizzando l'immigrazione irregolare, il diritto penale bandisce (categorie di) persone, e non atti/omissioni, facendo qualcosa che un diritto penale rispettoso di alcuni principi liberali fondamentali non dovrebbe …

media_common.quotation_subjectImmigrationCriminal procedureCriminologyStereotypePublic lawEspulsioneCriminalizationPolitical scienceStereotipiSoggezione a potere amministrativo stataleExpulsionmedia_commonTatstrafrecht versus TaeterstrafrechtSubjection to state’s administrative dominionImmigrazione irregolareTatstrafrecht vs. TaeterstrafrechtCriminalizationTheory of criminal justicePhilosophyLawCriminalizzazioneCriminal lawNormativePhilosophy of lawIllegal immigrationSettore IUS/17 - Diritto PenaleLawCriminal Law and Philosophy
researchProduct

Principios rectores en la adopción de diligencias limitativas de los derechos reconocidos en el art. 18 ce

2021

Criminal Procedure Law reform carried out in 2015 requires, in order to adopt the investigation proceedings that limit the rights recognized by art. 18 Spanish Constitution, to respect the guiding principles of specialty, suitability, exceptionality, necessity and proportionality. This article aims, departing from the legal text and considering existing jurisprudence, to unveil the true meaning of these principles.

necessity and proportionality. This article aims:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]Carolina Criminal Procedure Law reform carried out in 2015 requiresexceptionalityspecialityidoneidaddeparting from the legal text and considering existing jurisprudencein order to adopt the investigation proceedings that limit the rights recognized by art. 18 Spanish Constitutionespecialidadto unveil the true meaning of these principles. Diligencias de investigaciónproportionality 236 263necessityUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASproporcionalidadnecesidadCriminal investigations2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730058 Principios rectores en la adopción de diligencias limitativas de los derechos reconocidos en el art. 18 ce Sanchís Crespoexcepcionalidadsuitabilityto respect the guiding principles of specialty
researchProduct

The Reception of Positivism in Spain: Pedro Dorado Montero

2021

The current thesis focuses in one of Spain’s most relevant authors: Pedro Dorado Montero. Acting as a bridge between the criminal law conceptions of the 19th and 20th centuries, Dorado Montero offered a very unique, original theory: the ‘Derecho protector de los criminales’ (Protective Law of the Criminals). Towards the end of the 19th century, a clash between the penal neoclassical theories and the new positivist theories took place. As a result, the hegemony of the old school was contested. To this respect, Dorado Montero’s scholarly career, the context in which he lived and the several European and other international influences he received are duly analysed. Therefore, Dorado Montero’s …

punishmentsociology:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Teoría y métodos generales::Derecho comparado [UNESCO]UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Teoría y métodos generales::Filosofía del derechoUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Derecho y legislación nacionales::Derecho penalcomparative lawpositivismUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Teoría y métodos generales::Derecho de la antigüedad:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Derecho y legislación nacionales::Derecho penal [UNESCO]UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Teoría y métodos generales::Derecho comparadolegal history:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Teoría y métodos generales::Filosofía del derecho [UNESCO]legal philosophycriminal anthropologycriminologydelinquent:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Teoría y métodos generales::Derecho de la antigüedad [UNESCO]criminal lawcriminal procedure
researchProduct

Tiesības sevi neapsūdzēt kriminālprocesā

2013

Elektroniskā versija nesatur pielikumus

tiesības sevi neapsūdzēttiesības neliecinātvainas atzīšanatiesības uz taisnīgu tiesuright not to testifycilvēktiesības kriminālprocesāhuman rights in criminal procedureconfession of guiltright to a fair trialLawTiesību zinātneJuridiskā zinātneright not to incriminate oneself
researchProduct

Совершенствование форм и методов борьбы с преступностью

1989

Настоящий сборник результат содружества криминалистов трех университетов: Берлинского университета им.Гумбольдта, Щецинского университета и Латвийского государственного университета. Реформа уголовно-процессуального законодательства требует учета всего спектра высказанных суждений о правовой регламентации уголовного судопроизводства и осуществляемой на её основе криминалистической деятельности.

Уголовный процессПрокурорский надзорKriminālprocessОпознание личностиКриминалистикаПредварительное расследованиеKriminālistika:LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Procedural law::Criminal procedure [Research Subject Categories]Уголовное судопроизводствоПреступление
researchProduct