Search results for "Cronin"
showing 8 items of 8 documents
"Figure 11" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 60-88% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.
"Figure 8" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron RdA 0-20% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.
"Figure 9" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 20-40% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.
"Figure 7" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 0-100% d+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factors $R_{dA}$ and $R_{AA}$ for minimum bias $d$+Au and Au+Au collisions, for the $\pi^{0}$ and $e^{\pm}_{HF}$. The two boxes on the right side of the plot represent the global uncertainties in the $d$+Au (left) and Au+Au (right) values of $N_{coll}$ . An additional common global scaling uncertainty of 9.7% on $R_{dA}$ and $R_{AA}$ from the $p+p$ reference data is omitted for clarity.
"Figures 3-6" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron yield, $d$+Au $\implies$ CHARGED X. Electrons from heavy flavor decays, separated by centrality. The lines represent a fit to the previous $p+p$ result [23], scaled by $N_{coll}$. The inset shows the ratio of photonic background electrons determined by the converter and cocktail methods for Minimum Bias $d$+Au collisions, with error bars (boxes) that represent the statistical uncertainty on the converter data (systematic uncertainty on the photonic-electron cocktail).
"Figure 10" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 40-60% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.
"Figures 1-2" of "Cold-nuclear-matter effcts on heavy-quark production in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV"
2023
Heavy flavor electron yield, Run-8 $p$ + $p$, $d$+Au collisions. Electrons from heavy flavor decays, separated by centrality. The lines represent a fit to the previous $p+p$ result [23], scaled by $N_{coll}$. The inset shows the ratio of photonic background electrons determined by the converter and cocktail methods for Minimum Bias $d$+Au collisions, with error bars (boxes) that represent the statistical uncertainty on the converter data (systematic uncertainty on the photonic-electron cocktail).
Is the Ghosh model interesting?
2009
International audience; The overall value of the Ghosh model is appraised. Its treatment of quantities and prices is scrutinized by examining the variant with data in quantities and prices, and the variant with data in value and price indexes. The methodology involves returning to the accounting equations and shows that: (i) the Ghosh model offers solutions of limited interest, being incapable of providing prices or price indexes separately from quantities; (ii) what is taken to be the equation of Ghosh's value model is actually that of Ghosh's physical model; (iii) the Ghosh model may serve for cost-push exercises, but the dual of the Leontief model performs the same task in a much simpler…