Search results for "Deca-"
showing 10 items of 345 documents
CCDC 1952561: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2020
Related Article: Gianluca Ambrosi, M. Paz Clares, Isabel Pont, Mauro Formica, Vieri Fusi, Angela Ricci, Paola Paoli, Patrizia Rossi, Enrique García-España, Mario Inclán|2020|Dalton Trans.|49|1897|doi:10.1039/C9DT04764F
CCDC 2061409: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2021
Related Article: Erkam Cebi, Jan Klett|2021|Chem.-Eur.J.|27|12693|doi:10.1002/chem.202100912
CCDC 1919442: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2019
Related Article: Jana Anhäuser, Rakesh Puttreddy, Lukas Glanz, Andreas Schneider, Marianne Engeser, Kari Rissanen, Arne Lützen|2019|Chem.-Eur.J.|25|12294|doi:10.1002/chem.201903164
CCDC 1919440: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2019
Related Article: Jana Anhäuser, Rakesh Puttreddy, Lukas Glanz, Andreas Schneider, Marianne Engeser, Kari Rissanen, Arne Lützen|2019|Chem.-Eur.J.|25|12294|doi:10.1002/chem.201903164
Participation and performance trends in ultra-triathlons from 1985 to 2009
2010
We examined the changes in participation and performance trends in ultra-triathlons, from the Double Iron (7.6 km swimming, 360 km cycling, 84.4 km running) to the Deca Iron (38 km swimming, 1800 km cycling, 422 km running), between 1985 (first year of a Double Iron) and 2009 (25 years). The mean finish rate for all distances and races was 75.8%. Women accounted for ∼8-10% of the ultra-triathlons starters. For Double and Triple Iron, the number of finishers per year increased, from 17 to 98 and from 7 to 41, respectively. In the Deca Iron, the finishers per race have remained <20 since the first event was held, up to 2009. Concerning World best performances, the men were ∼19% faster than th…
A comparison of performance of Deca Iron and Triple Deca Iron ultra-triathletes
2014
This study intended to compare the performance of ultra-triathletes competing in a Deca Iron ultra-triathlon (i.e. 10 times 3.8 km swimming, 180 km cycling, and 42.2 km running) with the performance of athletes competing in a Triple Deca Iron ultra-triathlon (i.e. 30 times 3.8 km swimming, 180 km cycling, and 42.2 km running). Split and overall race times of six male finishers in a Deca Iron ultra-triathlon and eight male finishers in a Triple Deca Iron ultra-triathlon were analysed using multiple t-tests, linear and non-linear regression analyses, and analysis of variance. Among the 19 starters (i.e. 17 men and two women) in the Deca Iron ultra-triathlon, six men (i.e. 35.3% of all starter…
Age-related changes in ultra-triathlon performances
2012
International audience; BackgroundThe age-related decline in performance has been investigated in swimmers, runners and triathletes. No study has investigated the age-related performance decline in ultra-triathletes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the age-related declines in swimming, cycling, running and overall race time for both Triple Iron ultra-triathlon (11.4-km swimming, 540-km cycling and 126.6-km running) and Deca Iron ultra-triathlon (38-km swimming, 1,800-km cycling and 420-km running).MethodsThe age and performances of 423 male Triple Iron ultra-triathletes and 119 male Deca Iron ultra-triathletes were analysed from 1992 to 2010 using regression analyses and ANOVA.Resu…
CCDC 1456785: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2016
Related Article: Beáta Fekete, Márta Palkó, István Mándity, Matti Haukka, Ferenc Fülöp|2016|Eur.J.Org.Chem.|2016|3519|doi:10.1002/ejoc.201600434
CCDC 2131009: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2022
Related Article: Braulio M. Puerta Lombardi, Ethan R. Pezoulas, Roope A. Suvinen, Alexander Harrison, Zachary S. Dubrawski, Benjamin S. Gelfand, Heikki M. Tuononen, Roland Roesler|2022|Chem.Commun.|58|6482|doi:10.1039/D2CC01476A
CCDC 1479850: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination
2016
Related Article: Shuai Liu, Haofu Dai, Gamall Makhloufi, Christian Heering, Christoph Janiak, Rudolf Hartmann, Attila Mándi, Tibor Kurtán, Werner E. G. Müller, Matthias U. Kassack, Wenhan Lin, Zhen Liu, Peter Proksch|2016|J.Nat.Prod.|79|2332|doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00473