Search results for "Discriminant validity"

showing 3 items of 73 documents

Self‐management of immunomodulatory drug treatment in multiple myeloma patients

2019

Objective Immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs: thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide) are widely used in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of our study was to validate a questionnaire to evaluate the self-capacity of MM patients to manage IMID treatment including side effects. Methods We used a method adapted from the recommendations of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to validate a French questionnaire for patients with MM treated with IMIDs. Results The face validity was evaluated in 15 patients and the construct validity in 56 patients. For discriminant validity, two groups were constituted by gender and depending on whether they had a prev…

medicine.medical_specialtybusiness.industrySelf-ManagementDiscriminant validityReproducibility of ResultsConstruct validityPomalidomidemedicine.diseaseThalidomide03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePharmaceutical PreparationsOncologyConvergent validity030220 oncology & carcinogenesisInternal medicinemedicineHumansMultiple MyelomabusinessLenalidomideMultiple myelomaFace validitymedicine.drugLenalidomideEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
researchProduct

An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity

2022

Discriminant validity was originally presented as a set of empirical criteria that can be assessed from multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices. Because datasets used by applied researchers rarely lend themselves to MTMM analysis, the need to assess discriminant validity in empirical research has led to the introduction of numerous techniques, some of which have been introduced in an ad hoc manner and without rigorous methodological support. We review various definitions of and techniques for assessing discriminant validity and provide a generalized definition of discriminant validity based on the correlation between two measures after measurement error has been considered. We then review te…

validationaverage variance extractedconfirmatory factor analysismittaustilastomenetelmätkvantitatiivinen tutkimusorganisaatiotutkimuscross-loadingsheterotrait-monotrait ratiofaktorianalyysiMonte Carlo -menetelmätvalidointimeasurementMonte Carlo simulationdiscriminant validity
researchProduct

Toward a Dimensional Assessment of Externalizing Disorders in Children : Reliability and Validity of a Semi-Structured Parent Interview

2020

Objective: This study assesses the reliability and validity of the DSM-5-based, semi-structured Clinical Parent Interview for Externalizing Disorders in Children and Adolescents (ILF-EXTERNAL). Method: Participant data were drawn from the ongoing ESCAschool intervention study. The ILF-EXTERNAL was evaluated in a clinical sample of 474 children and adolescents (aged 6−12 years, 92 females) with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To obtain interrater reliability, the one-way random-effects, absolute agreement models of the intraclass correlation (ICC) for single ICC(1,1) and average measurements ICC(1,3) were computed between the interviewers and two independent rate…

validityODDIntraclass correlationstructured interviewlcsh:BF1-990intraclass correlation coefficientMedizinCBCLexternalizing disorders050105 experimental psychology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePsychologyADHD0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesChild Behavior ChecklistGeneral PsychologyOriginal Researchreliability05 social sciencesDiscriminant validityInter-rater reliabilitylcsh:Psychologystructured interview; ADHD; ODD; externalizing disorders; reliability; intraclass correlation coefficient; validityConvergent validityStructured interviewPsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryKappaClinical psychology
researchProduct