Search results for "Doctorants"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Un modèle théorique pour éclairer des histoires d’engagement dans la vulgarisation

2017

International audience; En France, la vulgarisation est inscrite dans les missions des établissements publics scientifiques et techniques. Elle est également une mission du métier de chercheur. Et pourtant, certains vulgarisent et d'autres non. Pourquoi ? Quelles sont les raisons invoquées par les uns ou les autres ; quels sont les contextes, incitations, barrières, croyances ou histoires qui peuvent expliquer qu'un chercheur s'engage ou non dans la vulgarisation ? Nous nous intéressons particulièrement aux facteurs qui pourraient influencer l'engagement de doctorants dans cette pratique de communication. Pour cela, nous utilisons une théorie phare de la psychologie sociale : la théorie du …

[SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology[SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics[SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/PsychologyPublic engagement in scienceThéorie du Comportement PlanifiéVulgarisation scientifique[ SHS.SOCIO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology[SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences[SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology[ SHS.PSY ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology[SHS.STAT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statisticsTheory of Planned Behavior[ SHS.INFO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciencesPhd studentsDoctorants[ SHS.STAT ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statisticsengagement
researchProduct

La vulgarisation scientifique et les doctorants : mesure de l'engagement, exploration d'effets sur le chercheur

2018

We ask two questions: what are the factors that influence researchers’ public engagement activities (PEA)? And what are the impacts of these activities on the researcher? After presenting a historical overview of PEA, we analyze 20 surveys carried out between 1967 and 2014. We identify some global trends: PEA is generally positively perceived, researcher’s engagement is occasional but robust. Besides those trends some differences appear between studies based on theoretical models and empirical studies: the latter report complaints such as lack of time or lack of recognition, whereas theoretical-based ones challenge these statements.To further explore our two questions, we used two approache…

Effects[SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences[SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/PsychologyResearchersPublic engagement activities[SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciencesOutreach activitiesPhD StudentsDoctorant[SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology[ SHS.PSY ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology[SHS.STAT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics[ SHS.INFO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciencesDoctorants[ SHS.STAT ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statisticsVulgarisationEngagementMotivation[SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology[SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statisticsReflexivitySelf-reflectionCommunicationChercheursPEAEffets[ SHS.SOCIO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/SociologyBenefitsPublic Engagement with ScienceRéflexivitéBénéficesRewards
researchProduct