Search results for "Fair Trial"

showing 8 items of 18 documents

The defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in the Italian criminal justice system

2021

The criminal law standard of Beyond A Reasonable Doubt (BARD) constitutes an evidentiary and judicial rule, formulated and applied for centuries in common law jurisdictions, which was expressly stated in the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure only about fifteen years ago. Unfortunately, the concept of reasonable doubt is inherently complex and does not easily lend itself to definition or refinement. In this regard, the Author examines especially the various positions and elaborations developed by legal literature and case-law in Italy, proposing a specific interpretation of the BARD rule that enhances and completes the particular procedural connotations of the adversarial system adopted i…

Sociology and Political ScienceCommon lawO standard penal do Beyond A Reasonable Doubt (BARD) constitui uma regra de prova e de juízo formulada e aplicada durante séculos em jurisdições de common law que foi expressamente introduzida no Código de Processo Penal italiano apenas cerca de quinze anos atrás. Infelizmente o conceito dedúvida razoável é inerentemente complexo e não se presta facilmente a uma definição ou a uma melhor delimitação. Diante disso o autor examina sobretudo as diferentes posições e elaborações desenvolvidas pela doutrina e pela jurisprudência na Itália oferecendo uma interpretação específica da regra BARD que valoriza e completa as conotações processuais particulares do sistema acusatório adotado na justiça penal italiana.Criminal procedureAdversarial systemreasonable doubtPolitical sciencefair trial.criminal procedureReasonable doubtPresumption of innocenceInterpretation (philosophy)dúvida razoável; processo penal; presunção de inocência; ônus da prova; standard de pro-va; método de raciocínio judicial; justo processo.judicial reasoning methodKPsychiatry and Mental healthreasonable doubt; criminal procedure; presumption of innocence; burden of proof; stand-ard of proof; judicial reasoning method; fair trial.AnthropologyLawSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleCriminal lawpresumption of innocencestand-ard of proofburden of proofLawSafety ResearchSettore IUS/17 - Diritto PenaleCriminal justice
researchProduct

Nodokļu administrācijas izdota administratīva akta prejudicialitāte civillietā

2017

Maģistra darba ietvaros autors vērtē nodokļu administrācijas izdota administratīva akta saistošo nozīmi civillietā. Nodokļu administrācijas izdotu administratīvu aktu gadījumā visbiežāk izplatītas ir zaudējumu atlīdzināšanas prasības, kuras administratīvā akta adresāts ceļ pret kādu citu personu, jo pienākums veikt papildus nodokļa, nokavējuma naudas vai soda naudas maksājumu ir radies šīs personas rīcības rezultātā. Autors darba ietvaros pamato hipotēzi, ka nodokļu administrācijas izdotam administratīvam aktam nevar būt prejudiciāla nozīme civillietā, ja persona, kuru skartu minētā administratīvā akta prejudicialitāte, nav bijis lietas dalībnieks administratīvajā procesā, kurā šis administ…

civillietaprejudicialitāteadministratīvs aktsTiesības uz taisnīgu tiesuJuridiskā zinātneRight to a fair trial
researchProduct

Effetti “inibitori” della interdittiva antimafia e bilanciamento fra principi costituzionali: alcune questioni di legittimità dedotte in una recente …

2021

Moving from a very recent order of submission to the Italian Constitutional Court, the paper analyses some of the critical profiles that – in the last years – are related to the institute if the s.c. “interdittiva antimafia” (i.e. “anti-mafia interdictive), among the wider discipline provided against the organized crime. Regarding the parameters evoked by the Administrative Judge, it is intended to reflect on the delicate balancing procedure between rights and liberties that – equally guaranteed by the Constitution – inevitably collide as the aforementioned institute is enforced and that require, then, a particular care by the proceeding Public Administration: the private economic initiativ…

fair trial private economic initiative freedom right to work judiciary control measures
researchProduct

La regola di giudizio nel patteggiamento tra cursus ordinario e revisione

2022

The article aims to deepen a fundamental and much debated profile in relation to the special rite of the Italian patteggiamento. In particular, the Author, in the light of an analysis of the undoubted particularities of the judicial mechanism of application of penalty upon request of the parties, intends to focus on the essence and the operation that the judgment rule assumes, respectively, in the ordinary cursus of criminal proceeding and in therevision, trying to offer an interpretative reconstruction that is able to reconcile the (substantial) needs of justice and the (formal) reasons for systematic coherence.

fair trialcriminal justice systemcriminal proceedings.Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penalerelevant and admissible evidenceSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penalecriminal procedure
researchProduct

L’incertezza probatoria tra poteri istruttori del giudice dibattimentale e regola decisoria del giudizio penale

2021

L’articolo affronta la questione delle relazioni sistemiche tra l’esercizio dei poteri del giudice di integrazione del materiale probatorio in dibattimento e la regola decisoria del giudizio penale sottesa al principio in dubio pro reo. In particolare, l’Autore intende approfondire la connotazione ontologica e il profilo operativo dell’incertezza probatoria capace di giustificare, rispettivamente, i poteri istruttori del giudice del dibattimento di primo grado e la decisione di assoluzione dell’imputato. The article addresses the issue of the systemic relationship between the exercise of the judge’s powers to integrate evidentiary materials at trial and the decision-making rule of the crimi…

fair trialevidenceSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale PenaleSettore IUS/17 - Diritto Penalecriminal procedure
researchProduct

L’acquisizione della prova tramite tortura e l’operatività della sanzione processuale

2021

Nel 2017 il legislatore italiano ha espressamente introdotto nel codice di rito penale la previsione per cui le dichiarazioni o le informazioni ottenute tramite il reato di tortura non sono comunque utilizzabili, salvo che contro le persone accusate di tale delitto e al fine esclusivo di provarne la responsabilità penale (art. 191 comma 2-bis c.p.p.). A questo riguardo, lo scritto mira, anzitutto, ad approfondire il ruolo e le finalità svolti da tale norma nell’ambito del sistema processuale penale. In particolare, l’Autore, oltre a compiere un’attenta analisi della portata della sanzione processuale ricollegabile alle prove acquisite con la tortura, intende svolgere alcune riflessioni crit…

fair trialevidenceSettore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penaletorturecriminal justice
researchProduct

Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

2022

El document forma part dels materials docents presentants al Servei de Política Lingüística de la Universitat de València, convocatòria Premis Fernando Sapiña 2022 a la qüalitat lingüística en l’elaboració de materials docents en valencià i en anglès. In this publication, I comment you the article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trialUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO::Derecho internacionalcharter of fundamental rightseuropean union
researchProduct

Tiesības sevi neapsūdzēt kriminālprocesā

2013

Elektroniskā versija nesatur pielikumus

tiesības sevi neapsūdzēttiesības neliecinātvainas atzīšanatiesības uz taisnīgu tiesuright not to testifycilvēktiesības kriminālprocesāhuman rights in criminal procedureconfession of guiltright to a fair trialLawTiesību zinātneJuridiskā zinātneright not to incriminate oneself
researchProduct