Search results for "First line"
showing 10 items of 83 documents
A phase II study of oxaliplatin (O) and gemcitabine (G) first line chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers
2005
Background: Biliary tract cancers are uncommon tumors with a poor prognosis and most patients (pts) present with invasive and inoperable disease at diagnosis. Chemotherapy represents a palliative treatment, but single or combination-drug schedules have demonstrated poor response rates with a median survival less than 6 months. Recently O and G have showed an interesting activity as single agents in this group of pts. Methods: We carried out a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined O and G in locally advanced and metastatic biliary tract carcinoma. The schedule of chemotherapy included O 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and G 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. I…
“Bevacizumab (Bev), irinotecan (IRI), folinic acid (FA), and 5-fluorouracil (FU) every 2 weeks (BIFF regimen) as first-line treatment for metastatic …
2009
e15067 Background: The IRIFAFU regimen produced in MCRC pts a consistent activity (RR, 33% [95% CI, 27–39%], PFS, 7.4 [95% CI, 6.5–8.3] mo.) in 2 consecutive randomized SICOG trials . Bev was proven to significantly improve the efficacy of IFL regimen. Here we report the safety and activity results of the BIFF regimen as first-line treatment of MCRC. Patients: From Feb 2007 to Jul 2008, 95 pts with MCRC were treated: so far, 85 pts were evaluated for safety: M/F were 47/38, median age (range) was 64 (35–78) yrs. Fifty-six pts had a colon, and 29 pts a rectal carcinoma. ECOG PS was 0 (63 pts, 74%), or 1 (22 pts, 26%). Thirty-four (40%) pts had 1 site, 33 (39%) 2 sites, and 18 (21%) pts ≥3 s…
Pembrolizumab in First-line Gastric Cancer: Win, Lose, or Draw?
2020
IMPORTANCE: Safe and effective therapies for untreated, advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer remain an unmet need. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone in patients with untreated, advanced G/GEJ cancer with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) of 1 or greater. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-062 randomized, controlled, partially blinded interventional trial enrolled 763 patients with untreated, locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic G/GEJ cancer with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or greater from 200 centers in 29 countries between September 18, …
Margetuximab (M) combined with anti-PD-1 (MGA012) or anti-PD-1/LAG-3 (MGD013) +/- chemotherapy (CTX) in first-line therapy of advanced/metastatic HER…
2020
TPS468 Background: Trastuzumab (T), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting HER2, is standard of care palliative 1st-line therapy for advanced HER2+ GEJ/GC patients (pts). M, an Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb, targets the same HER2 epitope but with higher affinity for both 158V (high binding) and 158F (low binding) alleles of activating Fc receptor CD16A. M coordinately enhanced both innate and adaptive immunity, including antigen-specific T-cell responses to HER2. PD-1 and LAG-3 are T-cell checkpoint molecules that suppress T-cell function. MGA012 (INCMGA00012) is a humanized, hinge-stabilized, IgG4 κ anti-PD-1 mAb blocking binding of PD-L1 or PD-L2 to PD-1. MGD013 is a humanized Fc-bearing bi…
First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo in advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer/esophageal adenoc…
2021
4002 Background: CheckMate 649 is the largest randomized, global phase 3 study of 1L programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitor–based therapy in GC/GEJC/EAC. 1L NIVO + chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) vs chemo, with progression-free survival (PFS) benefit and an acceptable safety profile in pts whose tumors expressed PD-ligand (L)1 at combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5 and ≥ 1, and in all randomized pts (Moehler et al. Ann Oncol 2020). We report additional data for all randomized pts. Methods: Eligible pts had previously untreated, unresectable advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC. Known HER2-positive pts were excluded. Pts were randomized to receive NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + …
PARALLEL 303: Phase 2 randomized study of pamiparib vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with inoperable locally advanced or metastati…
2021
3109 Background: A subset of gastric cancers exhibits platinum sensitivity and genomic instability that is characteristic of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Cells with HRD are sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy following platinum-based chemotherapy has been a successful treatment strategy in pts with ovarian cancer. Pamiparib is an orally administered selective PARP protein 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) inhibitor that has shown potent DNA-PARP trapping activity and crosses the blood brain barrier in preclinical studies. In early phase clinical studies (NCT02361723; NCT03333915), pamiparib showed an acceptable safety profile and pr…
Exploratory findings from a prematurely closed international, multicentre, academic trial: RAVELLO, a phase III study of regorafenib versus placebo a…
2019
Background In patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the role of maintenance therapy after first-line treatment with chemotherapy plus antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) is still an object of debate. Methods We assessed the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as a switch maintenance strategy after upfront 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus an anti- EGFR MoAb in patients with RAS WT mCRC. RAVELLO was a phase III, international, double-blind, placebocontrolled, academic trial. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and toxicity. Regorafenib or placebo were a…
FIRST-LINE THERAPY OF T-CELL LYMPHOMA: ALLOGENEIC OR AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION FOR CONSOLIDATION - FINAL RESULTS OF THE AATT STUDY
2019
GEICO (Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer) treatment guidelines in ovarian cancer 2012
2013
In 2006, under the auspices of The Spanish Research Group for Ovarian Cancer (Spanish initials GEICO), the first “Treatment Guidelines in Ovarian Cancer” were developed and then published in Clinical and Translational Oncology by Poveda Velasco et al. (Clin Transl Oncol 9(5):308–316, 2007). Almost 6 years have elapsed and over this time, we have seen some important developments in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Significant changes were also introduced after the GCIG-sponsored 4th Consensus Conference on Ovarian Cancer by Stuart et al. (Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:750–755, 2011). So we decided to update the treatment guidelines in ovarian cancer and, with this objective, a group of investigato…