Search results for "INTERNAZIONALE"
showing 10 items of 354 documents
Lezioni di diritto internazionale tributario
2005
Evoluzione statica e dinamica della definizione del rapporto giuridico d'imposta
2011
Ius migrandi e controllo delle frontiere
2015
Ius migrandi e confini statali. Migrazioni e diritto: quali regole? Il rapporto fra Stato e straniero: la soluzione della frammentazione degli status. Gli effetti del modello stato-centrico e della frammentazione degli status. Strategie per un'effettiva tutela dei diritti nel modello stato-centrico: l'accoglienza dei non cittadini.
Omicidi mirati a mezzo drone: brevi riflessioni a margine del caso "Lo Porto" tra diritto penale e diritto internazionale
2018
Quale diritto penale in ipotesi di "vittime collaterali" di drone strike? La sempre maggiore rilevanza che il fenomeno degli omicidi mirati a mezzo drone assume nel contesto internazionale pone la necessità di interrogarsi su come, nell'ordinamento interno, le categorie classiche del diritto penale debbano operare rispetto a fattispecie "peculiari", caratterizzate da una distanza fisica e psichica dal target e dall’esistenza di una “catena di comando” coinvolta, a più livelli, nella singola operazione di omicidio mirato. Si cercherà pertanto di capire, partendo dal caso dell'omicidio di un cittadino italiano per mezzo di droni statunitensi in Pakistan, ma fornendo un contributo di portata p…
Il distretto della pesca di Mazara del Vallo. Una buona pratica di cooperazione tra aziende internazionali
2008
La diretta applicabilità dei trattati nell’ordinamento italiano: quo vadis?
2022
The concept of ‘direct applicability’ and ‘self-executing’ nature of international norms is still object of intense debate in the international legal scholarship. In Italy, such a debate has attracted new attention in the light of a recent ruling of the Joint Sections of the Court of Cassation, according to which the norms enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights are not directly applicable in domestic proceedings. Such a statement seems to derive from some terminological and legal mis-understanding. By summarizing the conclusions of the several authors which have dealt with this issue in a Special Section of the review, the present article formulates some conclusions. First, it…
The political question doctrine vis-à-vis drones' ‘outsized power': Antithetical approaches in recent case-law
2020
The contributions deals with recent judgments delivered by domestic courts (in the US and Germany) and dealing with the justiciability of drone strikes.
Le droit à l’autodétermination du peuple palestinien
2016
The right of the Palestinian people to liberate themselves from foreign occupation in the name of the principle of self-determination has played, and is playing today, a central role in the resolution of the Arab-Israeli problem, representing a real catalyst principle in a process which, unfortunately, remains unfinished. The question today revolves around the fulfilment of an obligation to negotiate conventionally accepted by the parties, considered without alternative by the international community, but which in practice translates into a right of veto over the exercise of self-determination, contradicting the inalienable nature of this principle. Self-determination thus becomes negotiabl…
On the Absence of Direct Effect of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body's Decisions in the EU Legal Order
2012
This chapter talks about the Absence of Direct Effect of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body's Decisions in the EU Legal Order. It covers five main sections: (1) The Domestic Validity and Rank of Decision (2) Their Internal Effects (3) The 'Scope for Manoeuvre' Argument: An Assessment from the Perspective of the WTO Legal System (4) The 'Scope for Manoeuvre' Argument: An Assessment from the Perspective of the EU Legal System and (5) The Pragmatic Role Played by Direct Effect in the Protection of the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order and Its Costs. According to established case law, while the binding character of international agreements is sufficient to use WTO law as a standard for reviewing the …
M.N. e altri c. Belgio: qualche osservazione dissenziente
2021
In this commentary to the M.N. v. Belgium case, the authors criticize the three fundamental arguments on which the decision of the European Court of Human Rights is founded: the approach based on ‘originalism’, the approach based on the Courts’ precedents, and the approach based on consequentialism. As far as consequentialism is concerned, the authors approve the use of non strictly legal arguments in the Court’s reasoning, convinced as they are that human rights courts, more than any other judge, are not la bouche de la loi, but hold political power. We criticize the Court's choice to give space to only one of the (possible) political consequences of its decision, completely disregarding a…