Search results for "L41"

showing 9 items of 9 documents

The Influence of American Economists on the Clayton and Federal Trade Commission Acts

2011

The aim of this paper is to analyze American economists’ influence in the passing of the Clayton and Federal Trade Commission Acts (1914). Specifically, it is argued and documented that American economists were important in this process in two ways. Many economists exercised an “indirect” influence by discussing in academic journals and books problems concerning trusts, combinations, and the necessary measures to preserve the working of competitive markets. At least as importantly, if not more so, some economists took an active role in the reform movement both contributing to draft proposals for the amendment of existing antitrust legislation and providing help and advice during the Congres…

Antitrustjel:K21jel:L42Settore SECS-P/04 - Storia Del Pensiero Economicojel:B13Clayton Actjel:B14Federal Trade Commissionjel:L41jel:B15
researchProduct

Anatomy of Cartel Contracts

2013

We study cartel contracts using data on 18 contract clauses of 109 legal Finnish manufacturing cartels. One third of the clauses relate to raising profits; the others deal with instability through incentive compatibility, cartel organization, or external threats. Cartels use three main approaches to raise profits: Price, market allocation, and specialization. These appear to be substitutes. Choosing one has implications on how cartels deal with instability. Simplifying, we find that large cartels agree on prices, cartels in homogenous goods industries allocate markets, and small cartels avoid competition through specialization.

Competition (economics)Microeconomicsjel:K12antitrust; cartels; competition policy; contracts; industry heterogeneityIncentive compatibilitySpecialization (functional)CartelCartels; contracts; antitrust; competition policy; industry heterogeneity.Businessjel:L40jel:L41Competition policyIndustrial organization
researchProduct

Adam Smith on Monopoly Theory. Making good a lacuna

2014

This article analyses Adam Smith's views on monopoly by focusing on Book IV and V of The Wealth of Nations. It argues that the majority of scholars have assessed Smith's analysis of monopoly starting from premises different from those, actually though implicitly, used by Smith. We show that Smith makes use of the word 'monopoly' to refer to a heterogeneous collection of market outcomes, besides that of a single seller market, and that Smith's account of monopolists' behaviour is richer than that provided by later theorists. We also show that Smith was aware of the growth-retarding effect of monopoly and urged State regulation. © 2014 Scottish Economic Society.

Economics and EconometricsCompetition; Monopoly; Classical Economics; Adam SmithSociology and Political Sciencejel:B31Adam Smith Monopoly RegulationSubject (philosophy)jel:D42jel:B12Neoclassical economicsAdam smithjel:L51jel:L41Competition (economics)medicine.anatomical_structureEconomicsmedicineClassical economicsSettore SECS-P/01 - Economia PoliticaMonopolyLacunaScottish Journal of Political Economy
researchProduct

More firms, more competition? The case of the fourth operator in France's mobile phone market

2010

Accepted, Forthcoming; International audience; To foster competition the French government authorized a fourth operator, ‘Free', to enter the country's mobile phone market at the end of 2009 alongside Orange, SFR and Bouygues Telecom (BT), who held respectively one-half, one-third and one-sixth of the market. By using a stylized model of France's phone market, we have examined what we call the regulator's nightmares and dreams. If Cournot competition is in place before Free's entry, minimizing the total profit fails to maximize the consumer surplus and the total surplus; the maximum most realistic price fall is 6.7% compared to three-way competition and could be 1.7% only; if Orange, SFR an…

Economics and EconometricsJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsNew operatorEntryCartelManagement Science and Operations ResearchCournot competitionIndustrial and Manufacturing EngineeringProfit (economics)Competition (economics)nouvel operateurMonopolistic competitionMarket economyJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsPhone[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGSMStylized factJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionCartelCartel.Economic surplus[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGeneral Business Management and AccountingTéléphone mobileJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices3GentréeBusinessJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesMobile phone
researchProduct

Cartels Uncovered

2018

How many cartels are there? The answer is important in assessing the efficiency of competition policy. We present a Hidden Markov Model that answers the question, taking into account that often we do not know whether a cartel exists in an industry or not. Our model identifies key policy parameters from data generated under different competition policy regimes and may be used with time-series or panel data. We take the model to data from a period of legal cartels - Finnish manufacturing industries 1951 - 1990. Our estimates suggest that by the end of the period, almost all industries were cartelized.

Finnish-Soviet tradekilpailupolitiikkajel:L4001 natural sciencesjel:L41jel:L0jel:L60competition lawjel:L00010104 statistics & probabilitykartellit0502 economics and business050207 economics0101 mathematicsta511lainsäädäntöidänkauppa05 social scienceskorporativismiantitrust policykilpailuoikeuslaitAntitrust; cartel; competition; detection; Hidden Markov models; illegal; legal; leniency; policy; registry.jel:L4antitrust; cartel; competition; detection; Hidden Markov models; illegal; legal; leniency; policy; registrykilpailuGeneral Economics Econometrics and Financecartelscorporatism
researchProduct

With whom to merge? A tale of the Spanish banking deregulation process

2010

We propose a spatial competition model to study banks’ strategic responses to the asymmetric Spanish geographic deregulation process. We find that once the geographic deregulation process finishes, inter-regional mergers between savings banks are optimal whenever the economies of scale associated to merging activities are low. If there are large gains, then there will be mergers between savings and commercial banks.

G28L41Financial systemInternational tradeSpanish banking systemoptimal behaviorDeregulationCompetition modelC72Bankddc:330L51FusionSpanienL13DeregulierungBankenregulierungbusiness.industrybranch deregulationEconomies of scaleNichtkooperatives SpielG21mergersbusinessGeneral Economics Econometrics and FinanceMerge (version control)Public financeSERIEs
researchProduct

Co-determination and Merger Incentives from Transfers of Wealth: Firm Owners vs. Workers

2010

When workers can capture rents from their influence on corporate decisions, mergers can become a device to generate transfers of wealth. This paper examines the merger incentives from these transfers of wealth. It is found that worker influence increases merger profitability, in line with the owners’ incentive to use mergers to reduce the rents captured by workers. In contrast, the workers’ merger incentives are shown to be decreasing in their own degree of influence on the merger decision, in line with the view according to which workers can be used by incumbent managers as a defensive instrument in acquisitions.

HB Economic TheoryHG FinanceHF Commercejel:P14Mergers shareholders stakeholders worker influence co-determinationjel:G34jel:J53jel:L41AUCO Czech Economic Review
researchProduct

Is the French mobile phone cartel really a cartel?

2009

International audience; France Telecom (FT), SFR and Bouygues Telecom (BT) have been fined by France's Conseil de la Concurrence (CC) for organizing a mobile phone cartel with stable market shares (one-half, one-third and one-sixth, respectively) and for directly exchanging commercial information. While not contesting the legal decision, it is argued here that the economic reasoning is flawed. (1) As the CC made much of the firms' stable market shares, we have first followed this line of reasoning by considering that the market shares are quotas under uniform costs. Even if there is a general incentive to form a monopolistic cartel, BT was too small for it to be worth its while to join it; it i…

JEL : K - Law and Economics/K.K2 - Regulation and Business Law/K.K2.K21 - Antitrust LawEconomics and EconometricsCournotJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsStackelbergMobile telephonyCartelJEL L13 L41 L96 D43 K21Management Science and Operations ResearchCournot competitionIndustrial and Manufacturing EngineeringMicroeconomicsCompetition (economics)Monopolistic competitionJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L1 - Market Structure Firm Strategy and Market Performance/L.L1.L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect MarketsEconomicsStackelberg competition[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesMarket shareGSMARCEPJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionCartel[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceGeneral Business Management and AccountingJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D4 - Market Structure Pricing and Design/D.D4.D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market ImperfectionJEL: K - Law and Economics/K.K2 - Regulation and Business Law/K.K2.K21 - Antitrust LawJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities/L.L9.L96 - TelecommunicationsJEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesConseil de la ConcurrenceIncentiveMonopolyMobile phoneJEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies/L.L4.L41 - Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive PracticesInternational Journal of Production Economics
researchProduct

Equilibrium mergers in a composite good industry with efficiencies

2014

This paper studies equilibrium merging behavior in composite good industries. Component producers face the option to either merge with a similar component producer (horizontal merger) or a complementary one (complementary merger) of a composite good. Focusing only on strategic reasons, complementary mergers arise at equilibrium only when composite goods are very differentiated while horizontal mergers otherwise. Next, when efficiencies are considered, the level of marginal cost saving required for a horizontal merger in a composite industry to result in a non- increase in the upward price pressure index (UPPI) is greater as compared with the one in a regular industry. This result can be use…

Marginal costcomposite goods substitutes complements horizontal merger complementary merger efficiency effects UPPI diversion ratioL13business.industryL41Diversion ratioComputingMilieux_PERSONALCOMPUTINGPrice pressureInternational tradejel:L41Composite goodsSubstitutesComposite goodVertical mergerHorizontal mergerjel:L13Economicsddc:330businessGeneral Economics Econometrics and FinanceMerge (version control)Industrial organizationComplementsPublic financeEfficiency effects
researchProduct