Search results for "Multiobjective Optimization"

showing 10 items of 71 documents

On Constraint Handling in Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization

2016

Surrogate-assisted evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms are often used to solve computationally expensive problems. But their efficacy on handling constrained optimization problems having more than three objectives has not been widely studied. Particularly the issue of how feasible and infeasible solutions are handled in generating a data set for training a surrogate has not received much attention. In this paper, we use a recently proposed Kriging-assisted evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization and investigate the effect of infeasible solutions on the performance of the surrogates. We assume that constraint functions are computationally inexpensive and consid…

evolution controlmetamodelpäätöksentekomultiobjective optimizationcomputational cost
researchProduct

Towards resilient cities: Advancements allowed by a multi-criteria optimization tool to face the new challenges of European Union’s climate and energ…

2019

Abstract The United Nations as well as the European Union are strongly committed in promoting a transition towards more sustainable and resilient cities. Indeed, they are increasingly affected by different types of threats, among which the natural ones such as earthquakes, fires, and floods (shocks) and climate variability (stresses). Cities are quite often unable to cope with the adverse effects of such natural hazards. This circumstance leads to the need of introducing resilience-related criteria (besides commonly used sustainability indicators) in decision-making processes. This paper investigates at which extent the inclusion of such new indicators, within multi-criteria assessment tool…

green roofEnergy (esotericism)cool roofGreen roofFace (sociological concept)Indoor air pollutionHistoric preservationEnergy conservationmulticriteria assessmentEnvironmental protectionMulti criteriaSustainable developmentmedia_common.cataloged_instanceEuropean unionResilience (network)Concrete pavementsEnvironmental planningmedia_commonMultiobjective optimizationResiliencePublic administrationAir quality; Concrete pavements; Decision making; Energy conservation; Environmental protection; Historic preservation; Indoor air pollution; Multiobjective optimization; Public administration; Sustainable developmentAHP methodAir qualityBusinesspriority-setting process.Decision making
researchProduct

Coupling dynamic simulation and interactive multiobjective optimization for complex problems: An APROS-NIMBUS case study

2014

Dynamic process simulators for plant-wide process simulation and multiobjective optimization tools can be used by industries as a means to cut costs and enhance profitability. Specifically, dynamic process simulators are useful in the process plant design phase, as they provide several benefits such as savings in time and costs. On the other hand, multiobjective optimization tools are useful in obtaining the best possible process designs when multiple conflicting objectives are to be optimized simultaneously. Here we concentrate on interactive multiobjective optimization. When multiobjective optimization methods are used in process design, they need an access to dynamic process simulators, …

implementation challengesMathematical optimizationOptimization problemProcess (engineering)Computer scienceta111General Engineeringaugmented interactive multiobjective optimization algorithminteractive methodMulti-objective optimizationComputer Science ApplicationsEngineering optimizationSeparation processDynamic simulationSimulation-based optimizationIND-NIMBUSArtificial Intelligencedynamic process simulationApache ThriftPareto optimal solutionsProcess simulationsimulation based optimizationExpert Systems with Applications
researchProduct

Comparing reference point based interactive multiobjective optimization methods without a human decision maker

2022

AbstractInteractive multiobjective optimization methods have proven promising in solving optimization problems with conflicting objectives since they iteratively incorporate preference information of a decision maker in the search for the most preferred solution. To find the appropriate interactive method for various needs involves analysis of the strengths and weaknesses. However, extensive analysis with human decision makers may be too costly and for that reason, we propose an artificial decision maker to compare a class of popular interactive multiobjective optimization methods, i.e., reference point based methods. Without involving any human decision makers, the artificial decision make…

interactive multiobjective optimizationControl and OptimizationApplied MathematicspäätöksentekopäätöksentukijärjestelmätManagement Science and Operations ResearchmonitavoiteoptimointiComputer Science Applicationskoneoppiminenmulticriteria optimizationlearning phaseinteraktiivisuusBusiness Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)performance comparisondecision phasereference pointJournal of Global Optimization
researchProduct

On Using Decision Maker Preferences with ParEGO

2017

In this paper, an interactive version of the ParEGO algorithm is introduced for identifying most preferred solutions for computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems. It enables a decision maker to guide the search with her preferences and change them in case new insight is gained about the feasibility of the preferences. At each interaction, the decision maker is shown a subset of non-dominated solutions and she is assumed to provide her preferences in the form of preferred ranges for each objective. Internally, the algorithm samples reference points within the hyperbox defined by the preferred ranges in the objective space and uses a DACE model to approximate an achievem…

interactive multiobjective optimizationsurrogate-based optimizationpreference informationcomputational costvisualization
researchProduct

Multilayer perceptron training with multiobjective memetic optimization

2016

Machine learning tasks usually come with several mutually conflicting objectives. One example is the simplicity of the learning device contrasted with the accuracy of its performance after learning. Another common example is the trade-off that must often be made between the rate of false positive and false negative predictions in diagnostic applications. For computer programs that learn from data, these objectives are formulated as mathematical functions, each of which describes one facet of the desired learning outcome. Even functions that intend to optimize the same facet may behave in a subtly different and mutually conflicting way, depending on the task and the dataset being examined. Mul…

machine learningkoneoppiminenclassification algorithmsmemeettiset algoritmitalgoritmitmultiobjective optimizationmultilayer perceptronmemetic algorithmsneuroverkotmatemaattinen optimointineural networksluokitus
researchProduct

A Multiple Surrogate Assisted Decomposition Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Expensive Multi/Many-Objective Optimization

2019

Many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs) contain four or more conflicting objectives to be optimized. A number of efficient decomposition-based evolutionary algorithms have been developed in the recent years to solve them. However, computationally expensive MaOPs have been scarcely investigated. Typically, surrogate-assisted methods have been used in the literature to tackle computationally expensive problems, but such studies have largely focused on problems with 1–3 objectives. In this paper, we present an approach called hybrid surrogate-assisted many-objective evolutionary algorithm to solve computationally expensive MaOPs. The key features of the approach include: 1) the use of mul…

metamodelsmultiprotocol label switchingmultiobjective optimizationevoluutiolaskentareference vectorscomputational costmonitavoiteoptimointi
researchProduct

A visualization technique for accessing solution pool in interactive methods of multiobjective optimization

2015

<pre>Interactive methods of <span>multiobjective</span> optimization repetitively derive <span>Pareto</span> optimal solutions based on decision maker's preference information and present the obtained solutions for his/her consideration. Some interactive methods save the obtained solutions into a solution pool and, at each iteration, allow the decision maker considering any of solutions obtained earlier. This feature contributes to the flexibility of exploring the <span>Pareto</span> optimal set and learning about the optimization problem. However, in the case of many objective functions, the accumulation of derived solutions makes accessing the sol…

multidimensional scalingMathematical optimizationOptimization problemComputer Networks and CommunicationsComputer sciencevisualisointiPareto front visualizationcomputer.software_genreMulti-objective optimizationSet (abstract data type)menetelmätMultidimensional scalingMultiobjective optimizationdimensionality reductionFlexibility (engineering)pareto-tehokkuusDimensionality reductionMultiobjective optimization ; interactive methods ; Pareto front visualization ; dimensionality reduction ; multidimensional scalinginteractive methodsNIMBUSmonitavoiteoptimointiComputer Science ApplicationsVisualizationComputational Theory and MathematicsFeature (computer vision)interaktiivisuusData miningcomputer
researchProduct

Interactive methods for multiobjective robust optimization

2018

Practical optimization problems usually have multiple objectives, and they also involve uncertainty from different sources. Various robustness concepts have been proposed to handle multiple objectives and the involved uncertainty simultaneously. However, the practical applicability of the proposed concepts in decision making has not been widely studied in the literature. Developing solution methods to support a decision maker to find a most preferred robust solution is an even more rarely studied topic. Thus, we focus on two goals in this thesis including 1) analyzing the practical applicability of different robustness concepts in decision making and 2) developing interactive methods for sup…

optimointipareto-tehokkuusmultiobjective optimizationpäätöksentukijärjestelmätrobustnessdecision-makinginteractive methodsuncertaintymonitavoiteoptimointiepävarmuus
researchProduct

Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape

2017

The boreal biome, representing approximately one-third of remaining global forests, provides a number of crucial ecosystem services. A particular challenge in forest ecosystems is to reconcile demand for an increased timber production with provisioning of other ecosystem services and biodiversity. However, there is still little knowledge about how forest management could help solve this challenge. Hence, studies that investigate how to manage forests to reduce trade-offs between ecosystem services and biodiversity are urgently needed to help forest owners and policy makers take informed decisions. We applied seven alternative forest management regimes using a forest growth simulator in a la…

puunkorjuuforest planningclimate regulationkestävä metsätalousluonnon monimuotoisuusclimate change mitigationbiodiversiteettitrade-offsekosysteemipalvelutmetsätulothiilinielutmultiobjective optimizationmetsänhoitoFinland
researchProduct