Search results for "Open science"
showing 10 items of 52 documents
Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European health psychology soc…
2021
The current article describes a position statement and recommendations for actions that need to be taken to develop best practices for promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology endorsed at a Synergy Expert Group Meeting. Sixteen Synergy Meeting participants specializing in health, social and behavioural psychology convened to discuss priority issues regarding scientific integrity promotion and open science in health psychology. The group developed a set of recommendations for researchers, gatekeepers, and research end-users. The group process followed a nominal group technique and voting system to elicit and decide on the most relevant and topical issues. Seve…
Limited Usefulness of Capture Procedure and Capture Percentage for Evaluating Reproducibility in Psychological Science
2018
In psychological science, there is an increasing concern regarding the reproducibility of scientific findings. For instance, Replication Project: Psychology (Open Science Collaboration, 2015) found that the proportion of successful replication in psychology was 41%. This proportion was calculated based on Cumming and Maillardet’s (2006) widely employed capture procedure (CPro) and capture percentage (CPer). Despite the popularity of CPro and CPer, we believe that using them may lead to an incorrect conclusion of (a) successful replication when the population effect sizes in the original and replicated studies are different; and (b) unsuccessful replication when the population effect sizes i…
Déclaration des politiques des revues scientifiques françaises : un nouveau service via Mir@bel et Sherpa Romeo
2021
webinaire Médici #5 ; 50 participants; National audience; La formalisation par les revues scientifiques françaises de leur politique de publication en matière d'autoarchivage et de rediffusion voire réutilisation des contenus est essentielle dans le contexte de la politique nationale science ouverte. Non seulement il s'agit de décider de la diffusion mais il faut expliciter le cadre des autorisations et obligations au moyen de licences, de contrats, etc. Ces politiques déclarées par les éditeurs des revues sont agrégées via Sherpa Romeo ce qui en facilite la consultation et l'usage. Ce webinaire a pour objectif de faire connaître le rôle du réseau Mir@bel dans la déclaration de ces politiqu…
Le Réseau de pépinières de revues scientifiques REPÈRES : un révélateur de la complémentarité des métiers de l'infodoc et de l'édition
2020
The professional network "REPÈRES", created in 2018, aims at federating the open access scientific journals incubators and strengthening best practices around open access publishing in accordance with national policies promoting open access to science. The network shows evidence of convergence of practices from documentation and publishing professionals, resulting from the stimulus created by open access.
2021
Abstract New digital technologies and tools, together with evolving open physical and digital infrastructures, are remodelling science and innovation practices at universities and challenging their existing cultures, cognitive norms, missions, and policies. The purpose of this empirical study was to understand how existing and recently adopted open science practices and the underlying principles and attitudes of research teams support the advancement of knowledge and the development of actions, solutions, and technologies for sustainable development. The results of this study provide novel insights and important suggestions to guide the advancement of open science and innovation policies at…
A Case For a Study Quality Appraisal in Survey Studies in Psychology
2019
The lack of replication of key effects in psychology has highlighted some fundamental problems with reporting of research findings and methods used (Asendorpf et al., 2013; Open Science Collaboration, 2015). Problems with replication have been attributed to sources of bias such as questionable research practices like HARK-ing (Kerr, 1998) or p-hacking (Simmons et al., 2011). Another potential source of bias is lack of precision in the conduct and methods used in psychological research, which likely introduces systematic error into data collected with the potential to affect results. A related issue is lack of accuracy in reporting study methods and findings. There is, therefore, increased r…
Open data from the first and second observing runs of advanced LIGO and advanced Virgo
2021
Abbot, Rich, et al. (Virgo and MAGIC Collaboration)
The Finnish Open Science and Research Initiative and Development of Green Open Access in Finland
2016
Presentation in Slovakian Open Government Week, Bratislava, 19.10.2016
2020
Abstract Principles and practices of open science at universities are evolving. Increasing use and application of digital technologies and platforms in research and innovation are pushing universities to take up and develop new visions and principles for how research and innovation are performed. These open science policies and practices (i.e. open data sharing, open access publishing, open repositories, open physical labs, participatory design, and transdisciplinary research platforms) are expanding the ethos of science and innovation at universities. These new principles and practices of open science at universities are also triggering novel open innovation practices by university researc…
Résultats de l'enquête Archives Ouvertes Couperin 2019
2020
French Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are, for 89% of the respondents to the survey, now having their own open repository, or declaring to be in the implementation phase (compared to 82% in 2017 and only 62% in 2014). It can therefore be considered that almost all HEIs now offer a green open access repository or signalling solution to their researchers. The « still in progress » or suspended projects are rather related to the current recomposition of the Higher Education landscape. The most obvious obstacles to the latest implementations remain both the low involvement of researchers in the project and the human resources allocated. There is a slight but real increase in the rate of i…